首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重型颅脑损伤后颅内压监护的意义
引用本文:常文海,李庆彬. 重型颅脑损伤后颅内压监护的意义[J]. 天津医药, 2001, 29(1): 26-28
作者姓名:常文海  李庆彬
作者单位:1. 河南省焦作市人民医院脑外科
2. 天津医科大学总医院脑外科
摘    要:探讨55例重型脑外伤病人的颅内压(ICP)水平的变化和意义。方法全组病人均经侧脑室额角穿刺进行持续性脑室内压监护并记录,监护时间7小时到5天;监护后2小时的颅内压作为初压(入院压),分为ICP<2.67kPa和≥2.67kPa两组。持续监护中将lCP值分为3组<2.67kPa,2.67~5.33kPa及>5.33kPa。结果ICP≥2.67kPa者占71%,>5.33kPa者占16.5%。颅内血肿组ICP较脑挫伤组高(χ

关 键 词:重型颅脑损伤 颅内压 监护

Significance ofIntracranial Pressure Monitoring after Severe Head Injury
CHANG Wenhai,LI Qingbin. Significance ofIntracranial Pressure Monitoring after Severe Head Injury[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2001, 29(1): 26-28
Authors:CHANG Wenhai  LI Qingbin
Abstract:To study changes of intracranial pressure (ICP) in 55 patients with severe head injury and their clinical significances. Methods: The frontal horn of lateral ventricle was punctured. The ICP was continuously monitored and recorded.The monitoring duration was 7 hours to 5 days. The ICP at 2 hours after monitoring was acted as an initial value (admission value) . Based on < and ≥2.67 kPa,ICP values were classified into 2 groups. Based on <2.67 kPa,2.67~5.33 kPa and >5.33 kPa in continuously monitoring, ICP values were divided into 3 groups. Results: ICP was ≥2.67 kPa in 71% of cases,and >5.33 kPa in 16.5% .The ICPs in patients with intracranial hematoma were higher than those with brain contusion (x2 = 6.43, P <0.05). When an initial value was ≥2.67 kPa, it was associated with a poor outcome (x2 = 7.65, P <0.05). There were significant differences between different ICP in continuously monitoring (x2 = 13.23, P <0.05).Conclusion:The ICP monitoring may reflect the variations of clinical status and judge prognosis. It can early find secondary brain damages and direct their treatments too.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号