Open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: A regional experience

PurposeThe optimal approach for pediatric inguinal hernia repair continues to be debated. We conducted a regional retrospective study to assess rates of recurrence and metachronous hernias after open repair (OPEN) and laparoscopic repair (LAP)MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at two children's hospitals that serve a region of approximately 4 million people. All patients < 14 years old undergoing OPEN or LAP by pediatric surgeons during a 5-year period (2011 – 2015) were analyzed after a minimum follow up of 4 years. Cox proportional regression was used to compare the effect of surgical approach on hernia recurrence and metachronous contralateral hernias.ResultsA total of 1,952 patients, 587 female (30%) and 1365 male (70%), had 2305 hernias repaired. Median post operative follow up time was 6.6 years (range 4–9 years). OPEN and LAP were performed for 1827 (79%) and 478 (21%) hernias, respectively. There were no significant differences in rate of prematurity, age at repair, or frequency of emergent repair. LAP was associated with a lower incidence of metachronous contralateral hernias compared to OPEN (1.4% vs 3.8%, p = 0.047), and a higher incidence of recurrence (9% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, LAP had a higher rate of recurrence than OPEN (hazard ratio 10.4, 95% CI 6–18.1).The recurrence rate did not decrease over the study period (p = 0.731).ConclusionLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children resulted in a modest decrease in the incidence of metachronous hernias, at the cost of a significant increase in recurrence.Type of StudyRetrospective Comparative Study.Level of evidenceLevel III.