Clinical Behavior of Combined Versus Pure High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical behaviors of combined and pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [LCNEC] and small-cell lung carcinoma [SCLC]).Patients and MethodsData of 132 patients who underwent complete resection for combined or pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (combined group, 67; pure group, 65) between January 2001 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological features were analyzed and compared, and the prognoses were assessed by performing the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe combined and pure groups had nearly equivalent clinicopathological characteristics, specifically, older males with smoking history, almost the same percentage of pleural/lymphatic/vascular invasion, and nearly the same recurrence rates and relapse patterns.The combined group had prognosis equivalent to that of the pure group (5-year overall survival [OS] rates: 61.8% vs. 52.2%, respectively; P = .82 and 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rates: 42.4% vs. 43.9%, respectively; P = .96), and this trend was identified in sub-analyses only for patients with LCNEC, SCLC, and the same pathological stage.Multivariable Cox regression analysis in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma revealed that vascular invasion and pathological stage were independent prognostic factors for OS; more importantly, combined and pure histologies were proven to have nearly equivalent associations with prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.22to 1.66; P = .96).ResultsCombined high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma had clinical behavior equivalent to those of pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, with similar clinicopathological characteristics.