首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Efficacy and Safety of Oral Mirodenafil in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Diabetic Men in Korea: A Multicenter,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Authors:Hyun Jun Park  Hyung Ki Choi  Tai Young Ahn  Jong Kwan Park  Woo Sik Chung  Sung Won Lee  Sae Woong Kim  Jae Seog Hyun  Nam Cheol Park
Affiliation:2. Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea;3. Department of Urology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;4. Department of Urology, Ulsan University School of Medicine, Soeul, Korea;2. Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea;11. Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;12. Department of Urology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;8. Department of Urology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea;1. Academic Medical Center–University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA;2. Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsFaculty of MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong SAR
Abstract:IntroductionMirodenafil is a newly developed selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).AimTo evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirodenafil in the treatment of ED in Korean men with diabetes.MethodsA multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted with 112 subjects who were randomized to either placebo or mirodenafil 100 mg on demand for 12 weeks.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary efficacy variable was the erectile function (EF) domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary efficacy variables included change in the scores of IIEF question 3 and 4 (IIEF Q3 and Q4) from baseline, change in all domain scores in the IIEF from baseline, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3), the Global Assessment Question (GAQ) and the Life Satisfaction Checklist (LSC).ResultsAfter 12 weeks of treatment, mirodenafil group showed significantly greater change in the IIEF-EF domain score from baseline compared with the placebo group (9.3 vs. 1.4, P < 0.0001). The changes from baseline in the mirodenafil group in IIEF Q3 (1.7 vs. 0.4, P < 0.0001) and Q4 (1.7 vs. 0.3, P < 0.0001) were higher compared with the placebo group. Differences between the mirodenafil and placebo groups were significant in the SEP2 (82.0% vs. 55.2%, P = 0.0003), SEP3 (68.9% vs. 22.3%, P < 0.0001). Difference in GAQ “YES” responses was also significant (76.9% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001). Normal EF domain scores (≥26) at study end were achieved by 32.7% and 9.4% in the mirodeniafl and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.0031). As for the LSC scores, the mirodenafil group showed significantly greater improvements in sexual life and partner relationship than the placebo group. Most treatment-associated AEs were mild that resolved spontaneously.ConclusionsMirodenafil is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of diabetic patients with ED in Korea. Park HJ, Choi HK, Ahn TY, Park JK, Chung WS, Lee SW, Kim SW, Hyun JS, and Park NC. Efficacy and safety of oral mirodenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men in Korea: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号