首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2个治疗计划系统调强放疗剂量验证比较
引用本文:陈杰,朱云云,朱锦锋.2个治疗计划系统调强放疗剂量验证比较[J].医疗卫生装备,2012,33(9):111-112.
作者姓名:陈杰  朱云云  朱锦锋
作者单位:南京军区福州总医院放疗科,福州,350025
摘    要:目的 :通过比较Xio和Oncentra MasterPlan 2个治疗计划系统调强放疗剂量验证的结果,评价它们应用于临床的准确性。方法:用IBA二维电离室矩阵MatriXX分别采集Xio和Oncentra MasterPlan系统的鼻咽癌调强照射野数据,并用IBA Omnipro I’mRT1.6软件分析处理。结果:Xio系统62个照射野3 mm 3%通过率均值为95.4%,3 mm 5%为98.4%;Oncentra MasterPlan系统75个照射野3 mm 3%通过率均值为92.8%,3 mm 5%为95.8%。二者差别具有统计学意义。结论:2个治疗计划系统都可以应用于临床调强放疗,Xio系统的准确性要优于Oncentra MasterPlan系统。

关 键 词:调强放疗  剂量验证  Gamma通过率  Xio  Oncentra  MasterPlan

Comparison of IMRT Dose Verification between Two Treatment Planning Systems
CHEN Jie , ZHU Yun-yun , ZHU Jin-feng.Comparison of IMRT Dose Verification between Two Treatment Planning Systems[J].Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2012,33(9):111-112.
Authors:CHEN Jie  ZHU Yun-yun  ZHU Jin-feng
Institution:(Radiotherapy Department, Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Military Area Command, FuZhou 350025, China)
Abstract:Objoctive To value the clinical accuracy of Xio and Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning systems for theirIMRT dose verification, Methods Both the NPC IMRT beam dose data of Xio and Oncentra MasterPlan systems were collected by IBA MatriXX. Then they were analyzed by IBA OmniPro FmRT 1.6 software. Results The 3mm 3% averagepass rate of 62 beams in Xio system was 95.4% and the 3ram 5% was 98.4%. The 3ram 3% average pass rate of 75 beams in Oncentra MasterPlan system was 92.8% and the 3mm 5% was 95.8%. The difference between Xio and OneentraMasterPlan systems was statistically significant. Conclusion The two treatment planning systems can be applied to clinical IMRT, moreover, Xio system has a higher accuracy than Oncentra MasterPlan system. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2012,33(9) : 111-112]
Keywords:IMRT  dose verification  Gamma pass rate  Xio  Oncentra MasterPlan
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号