中西医结合治疗气滞血瘀型原发性痛经临床观察

目的：探讨中西医结合治疗气滞血瘀型原发性痛经的临床效果。方法整群选取该院于2015年1月—2016年1月诊治的气滞血瘀型原发性痛经患者165例,随机分成A组、B组和C组。 A组采用西药消炎痛栓治疗,B组采用中药痛经方治疗,C组采用B组中药联合A组西药进行中西医结合治疗,分别治疗3个周期后,对3组的疗效进行比较。结果总有效率A组为67.27%,B组为70.91%, C组为94.55%。C组与A、B两组进行比较,C组疗效要高于A、B两组,差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；痛经症状的改善及复发率,C组与A、B两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论中西医结合治疗气滞血瘀型原发性痛经,其疗效比单纯西药或中药更佳。

The Rreatment of Blood Stasis Type Primary Dysmenorrhea Clinical Obser-vation of Combined Chinese and Western Medicine

Objective To observe the clinical effect of combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment of qi stagnation and blood stasis type primary dysmenorrhea. Methods Group selection 165 patients from January 2015 to January 2016 were randomly divided into A group, B group and C group. A group was treated with western medicine, group B was treated with traditional Chinese medicine treatment, C group were treated with combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment, respectively, after 3 cycles of treatment, compare the efficacy of 3 groups. Results The total ef-fective rate was 67.27% in A group, B group 70.91%, C group was 94.55%. Group C and a, B two groups were compared, the effect in group C was to be higher than that of a, B two groups compared with statistical significance (P< 0.05); dys-menorrhea symptom improvement and recurrence rate, group C and a, B two groups the difference is significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of blood stasis type primary dysmenorrhea conclusion combine traditional Chinese and Western medicine, the curative effect is better than pure western medicine or traditional Chinese medicine.