Analysis of serial magnetic resonance images of mouse brains using image registration |
| |
Authors: | Satheesh Maheswaran Hervé Barjat Simon T. Bate Paul Aljabar Derek L.G. Hill Lorna Tilling Neil Upton Michael F. James Joseph V. Hajnal Daniel Rueckert |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Computing, 180 Queen''s Gate, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK;2. Neurology and Gastrointestinal Centre of Excellence for Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, New Frontiers Science Park (North), Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK;3. Statistical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, New Frontiers Science Park (North), Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK;4. IXICO Ltd, The London Bioscience Innovation Centre, 2 Royal College Street, London, NW1 0NH, UK;5. Imaging Sciences Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, W12 0NN, UK |
| |
Abstract: | The aim of this paper is to investigate techniques that can identify and quantify cross-sectional differences and longitudinal changes in vivo from magnetic resonance images of murine models of brain disease. Two different approaches have been compared. The first approach is a segmentation-based approach: Each subject at each time point is automatically segmented into a number of anatomical structures using atlas-based segmentation. This allows cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of group differences on a structure-by-structure basis. The second approach is a deformation-based approach: Longitudinal changes are quantified by the registration of each subject's follow-up images to that subject's baseline image. In addition the baseline images can be registered to an atlas allowing voxel-wise analysis of cross-sectional differences between groups. Both approaches have been tested on two groups of mice: A transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease and a wild-type background strain, using serial imaging performed over the age range from 6–14 months. We show that both approaches are able to identify longitudinal and cross-sectional differences. However, atlas-based segmentation suffers from the inability to detect differences across populations and across time in regions which are much smaller than the anatomical regions. In contrast to this, the deformation-based approach can detect statistically significant differences in highly localized areas. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|