首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

甲磺酸帕珠沙星注射液治疗急性呼吸道感染的多中心随机对照试验
引用本文:郑莉,徐楠,吴松泽,刘跃建,王伟,韩雪芳.甲磺酸帕珠沙星注射液治疗急性呼吸道感染的多中心随机对照试验[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(12):851-855.
作者姓名:郑莉  徐楠  吴松泽  刘跃建  王伟  韩雪芳
作者单位:1. 四川大学华西医院临床药理研究所,成都,610041
2. 四川省人民医院,成都,610072
3. 成都市第三人民医院,成都,610031
4. 陕西省人民医院,西安,710068
摘    要:目的评价国产甲磺酸帕珠沙星注射液治疗急性呼吸道细菌感染的有效性与安全性。方法试验采用多中心、随机、阳性药物平行对照、非盲法试验设计,共纳入134例受试者,随机分为试验组68例和对照组66例,试验组与对照组分别接受甲磺酸帕珠沙星500mg与左氧氟沙星300mg,每12h静脉滴注1次,每日两次治疗,疗程均为7~10天,病情重者可延长至14天。结果试验组与对照组的急性呼吸道感染的临床痊愈率分别为52.9%、57.6%(FAS分析集)和57.1%、61.3%(PPS分析集);临床有效率分别为86.8%、87.9%(FAS分析集)和93.7%、93.6%(PPS分析集),两组比较差异无统计学意义,表明两药疗效相当。两组的细菌阴转率分别为92.5%和94.3%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。安全性评价结果显示,两组临床不良反应发生率分别为16.2%和16.7%,均以局部刺激及消化道反应为主,但大多轻微,无需特殊处理。结论甲磺酸帕珠沙星注射液治疗急性呼吸道细菌感染疗效确切,不良反应少,安全性较好,适合敏感菌所致的中重度呼吸道细菌感染及不能口服给药的患者使用。

关 键 词:甲磺酸帕珠沙星  左氧氟沙星  急性呼吸道感染  多中心随机对照试验
收稿时间:2007-09-30
修稿时间:2007-10-31

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Pazufloxacin Mesilate versus Lofloxacin in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infections
ZHENG Li,XU Nan,WU Song-ze,LIU Yao-jian,WANG Wei,HAN Xue-fang.A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Pazufloxacin Mesilate versus Lofloxacin in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infections[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine,2007,7(12):851-855.
Authors:ZHENG Li  XU Nan  WU Song-ze  LIU Yao-jian  WANG Wei  HAN Xue-fang
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pazu oxacin for the treatment of moderate and severe acute bacterial respiratory infections. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the e cacy and safety of pazufloxacin versus levofloxacin. Patients in the pazu oxacin group were treated with pazu oxacin (500 mg twice daily for 7 to 10 days), and patients in the levo oxacin group were treated with levofloxacin (300 mg twice daily for 7 to 10 days). Results A total of 134 patients were enrolled in the study, 68 cases in pazu oxacin group and 66 cases in levo oxacin group were assessable for clinical e cacy by full analysis set(FAS). At the end of the treatment, in FAS analysis the total cure rates and e ective rates were 52.9% and 86.7% in pazu oxacin group, 57.6% and 87.9% inlevo oxacin group, in PPS analysis the total cure rats and e ective rates were 57.1% and 93.7% in pazu oxacin group respectively, 61.3% and 93.6% in levo oxacin group. The bacterial clearance rates were 92.5% and 94.3% respectively. There were no statistically signi cant di erences between the two groups. Adverse reactions were observed in 16.2% of patients in the pazu oxacin group and in 16.7% of patients in the levo oxacin group. These reactions were mainly local stimulation, nausea and diarrhea. No serious adverse event was reported in either group. Conclusion Pazu oxacin is as e ective and safe as levo oxacin for the treatment of moderate to severe acute respiratory infections.
Keywords:Pazu oxacin mesilate  Levo oxacin  Acute respiratory infections  Multicenter randomized controlled trial
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号