首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Use of Temporary Enteral Access Devices in Hospitalized Neonatal and Pediatric Patients in the United States
Authors:Beth Lyman MSN  RN  CNSC  Carol Kemper PhD  RN  CPHQ  LaDonna Northington DNS  RN  Jane Anne Yaworski MSN  RN  Kerry Wilder BSN  RN  MBA  Candice Moore BSN  RN  CPN  Lori A Duesing MSN  RN  CPNP‐AC  Sharon Irving PhD  RN
Institution:1. Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri;2. University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Nursing, Jackson, Mississippi;3. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;4. Children's Medical Center of Dallas Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Dallas, Texas;5. Cinncinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio;6. Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;7. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing and Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Abstract:Background: Temporary enteral access devices (EADs), such as nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), and postpyloric (PP), are used in pediatric and neonatal patients to administer nutrition, fluids, and medications. While the use of these temporary EADs is common in pediatric care, it is not known how often these devices are used, what inpatient locations have the highest usage, what size tube is used for a given weight or age of patient, and how placement is verified per hospital policy. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter 1‐day prevalence study. Participating hospitals counted the number of NG, OG, and PP tubes present in their pediatric and neonatal inpatient population. Additional data collected included age, weight and location of the patient, type of hospital, census for that day, and the method(s) used to verify initial tube placement. Results: Of the 63 participating hospitals, there was an overall prevalence of 1991 temporary EADs in a total pediatric and neonatal inpatient census of 8333 children (24% prevalence). There were 1316 NG (66%), 414 were OG (21%), and 261 PP (17%) EADs. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) had the highest prevalence (61%), followed by a medical/surgical unit (21%) and pediatric intensive care unit (18%). Verification of EAD placement was reported to be aspiration from the tube (n = 21), auscultation (n = 18), measurement (n = 8), pH (n = 10), and X‐ray (n = 6). Conclusion: The use of temporary EADs is common in pediatric care. There is wide variation in how placement of these tubes is verified.
Keywords:pediatric  enteral access devices
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号