首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中间入路与混合入路的近期疗效对比
引用本文:雷天翔,孙开宇,魏哲威,王亮,徐建波,张信华,叶致君,宋武.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中间入路与混合入路的近期疗效对比[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2022(1):56-59.
作者姓名:雷天翔  孙开宇  魏哲威  王亮  徐建波  张信华  叶致君  宋武
作者单位:1.中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81871908);国家自然科学基金(82070529)。
摘    要:目的:探讨腹腔镜中间入路与混合入路治疗右半结肠癌的近期疗效.方法:回顾分析2016年1月至2021年8月为109例患者行腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的临床资料,比较两组近期疗效.结果:混合入路组手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次排便时间均少于中间入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术中淋巴结清扫数量、并发症发生率及其他...

关 键 词:结肠肿瘤  腹腔镜检查  中间入路  混合入路  疗效比较研究

Short-term efficacy comparison of middle approach and mixed approach in the laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for cancer
Institution:(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University,Guangzhou 510080,China)
Abstract:Objective:To explore the short-term efficacy of middle and mixed approaches in the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on clinical data of 109 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for cancer between Jan.2016 and Aug.2021,and the short-term efficacy of two approaches were compared.Results:The surgery time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative first defecation time in the mixed approach group were less than those in the middle approach group(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes,the incidence of complications and other postoperative recovery indicators between the two groups.Conclusions:Compared with the middle approach,the mixed approach in the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is better in short-term efficacy,and is a better choice of right colonic cancer.
Keywords:Colonic neoplasms  Laparoscopy  Middle approach  Mixed approach  Comparative effectiveness research
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号