首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Two modes of acupuncture as a treatment for hot flushes in men with prostate cancer--a prospective multicenter study with long-term follow-up
Authors:Frisk Jessica  Spetz Anna-Clara  Hjertberg Hans  Petersson Bill  Hammar Mats
Affiliation:1. Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;2. Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Norrköping, Sweden;3. Department of Urology, County Council of Östergötland, Norrköping and Linköping, Sweden
Abstract:

Background

Hot flushes are common and distressing among men with castrational treatment for prostate cancer. Of the few treatments, most have side effects.

Objective

Assess changes in hot flushes of electrostimulated (EA) and traditional acupuncture (TA).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Thirty-one men with hot flushes due to prostate cancer treatment were recruited from three urological departments in Sweden, from 2001 to 2004.

Intervention

Thirty-one men were randomized to EA (12 needle points, with 4 electrostimulated) or TA (12 needle points) weekly for 12 wk.

Measurements

Primary outcome: number of and distress from hot flushes in 24 h and change in “hot flush score.” Secondary outcome: change in 24-h urine excretion of CGRP (calcitonin gene–related peptide).

Results and Limitations

Twenty-nine men completed the treatment. Hot flushes per 24 h decreased significantly, from a median of 7.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.0–12.3) at baseline in the EA group to 4.1 (IQR, 2.0–6.5) (p = 0.012) after 12 wk, and from 5.7 (IQR, 5.1–9.5) in the TA group to 3.4 (IQR1.8–6.3) (p = 0.001). Distress by flushes decreased from 8.2 (IQR, 6.5–10.7) in the EA group to 3.3 (IQR, 0.3–8.1) (p = 0.003), and from 7.6 (IQR, 4.7–8.3) to 3.4 (IQR, 2.0–5.6) (p = 0.001) in the TA group after 12 wk, (78% and 73% reduction in “hot flush score,” respectively). The effect lasted up to 9 mo after treatment ended. CGRP did not change significantly. Few, minor side effects were reported.Limitations: small number of patients; no placebo control, instead a small group controlled for 6 wk pretreatment.

Conclusions

EA and TA lowered number of and distress from hot flushes. The hot flush score decreased 78% and 73%, respectively, in line with or better than medical regimens for these symptoms. Acupuncture should be considered an alternative treatment for these symptoms, but further evaluation is needed, preferably with a non- or placebo-treated control group.
Keywords:Hot flushes   Prostate neoplasms   Acupuncture   Castration
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号