首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

前列地尔对肝细胞癌动脉化疗栓塞后肝血流灌注的影响
引用本文:李家平,王海林,黄勇慧,李鹤平,王于,谭国胜,陈伟,杨建勇.前列地尔对肝细胞癌动脉化疗栓塞后肝血流灌注的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,2009,43(10).
作者姓名:李家平  王海林  黄勇慧  李鹤平  王于  谭国胜  陈伟  杨建勇
作者单位:1. 中山大学附属第一医院介入放射科,广州,510080
2. 广州市第一人民医院放射科
摘    要:目的 初步探讨前列地尔(PGE_1)对肝细胞癌(HCC)经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后肝血流灌注的影响.方法 连续搜集接受TACE初治的HCC患者64例,随机数字法分为对照组与PGE_1组,每组32例.对照组接受常规TACE治疗,第1次TACE4周后复治;PGE_1组于TACE后经外周静脉推注PGE_11次/d,连续1周,用药量为0.4μg/kg.所有患者于术前1周、术后4周内行非瘤区肝CT灌注成像(CTPI),测量肝动脉灌注量(HAP)、门静脉灌注量(PVP)、肝总血流灌注量(TLP)、肝动脉灌注指数(HPI),TACE后不同时期肝灌注参数的组内比较采用单因素方差分析,对照组与PGE_1组肝各灌注参数组间比较采用t检验.结果 对照组术前1周、第1次术后、第2次术后的HAP分别为(0.18±0.08)、(0.22±0.09)、(0.32±0.10)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);PVP分别为(1.11±0.31)、(0.82±0.27)、(0.59±0.25)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);TLP分别为(1.29±0.33)、(1.04±0.28)、(0.91±0.24)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);HPI分别为(14.31±6.36)%、(21.37±9.07)%、(36.67±13.42)%.TACE不同时间HAP、PVP、TLP、HPI组间差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为19.71、27.47、14.75、41.41,P值均<0.05).PGE_1组术前1周、第1次术后4周、第2次术后4周的HAP分别为(0.17±0.08)、(0.20±0.08)、(0.26±0.08)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);PVP分别为(1.09±0.36)、(1.03±0.40)、(0.91±0.41)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);TLP分别为(1.26±0.38)、(1.23±0.40)、(1.17±0.44)ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1);HPI分别为(14.04±6.71)%、(17.26±7.86)%、(23.93±8.96)%.其中HAP与HPI组间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为10.78、13.05,P值均<0.05),而PVP与TLP组间差异无统计学意义(F值分别为1.73、0.39,P值均>0.05).第1次术后对照组与PGE1组的PVP与TLP的组间差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.37、-2.14,P值均<0.05),而HAP、HPI组间差异无统计学意义(t值分别为0.86、2.24,P值均>0.05);第2次术后对照组与PGE1组的HAP、PVP、TLP、HPI组间差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.55、-4.49、-3.41、5.09,P值均<0.05).结论 TACE后肝PVP与TLP减少而HAP与HPI增加,PGE_1能改善以PVP为主的肝血流灌注,有助于减轻TACE对非瘤区肝组织的损害.

关 键 词:肝肿瘤  化学栓塞  治疗性  灌流  体层摄影术  X线计算机

The effect of alprostadil on hepatic perfusion after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
LI Jia-ping,WANG Hai-lin,HUANG Yong-hui,LI He-ping,WANG Yu,TAN Guo-sheng,CHEN Wei,YANG Jian-yong.The effect of alprostadil on hepatic perfusion after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Radiology,2009,43(10).
Authors:LI Jia-ping  WANG Hai-lin  HUANG Yong-hui  LI He-ping  WANG Yu  TAN Guo-sheng  CHEN Wei  YANG Jian-yong
Abstract:Objective To investigate the role of alprostadil on hepatic perfusion after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Sixty-four consecutive patients with HCC were randomized to either treatment with PGE_1 after TACE (treatment group, 32 cases) or no additional treatment after TACE (control group, 32 cases). In PGE_1 group, Lipo-PGE_1 was administered intravenously once a day for total of seven days, once after completion of TACE. The dosage of Lipo-PGE_1 was 0.4μg/kg and rote 0.05 μg·kg~(-1)·min~(-1). In control group, regular TACE was used. All patients underwent hepatic CT perfusion within 1 week before TACE and 4 weeks after TACE. The parameters of hepatic perfusion, including hepatic arterial perfusion value (HAP), portal vein perfusion value (PVP), total liver perfusion value (TLP) , and hepatic arterial perfusion index (HPI) were measured and compared. Chi-Square test was used for comparison of CT perfusion parameters in different stage, and t test was used for comparison of each CT porfusion parameter between two groups. Results In control group, HAP of pre-TACE, 4 weeks after first TACE, and 4 weeks after second TACE was (0.18±0.08), (0.22±0.09), (0.32±0.10) ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1), respectively. Likewise, PVP was (1.11±0.31)、(0.82±0.27)、(0.59±0.25) ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1), respectively, and TLP was (1.29±0.33), (1.04±0.28), (0.91±0.24) ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1), respectively, and HPI was (14.31±6.36)%, (21.37±9.07)%, (36.67±13.42)%, respectively. The perfusion parameters at different stages of TACE were statistically different (F=19.71,27.47,14.75,41.41, P<0.05). In PGE1 group, HAP before TACE, after first TACE, and after second TACE was (0.17±0.08), (0.20±0.08), (0.26±0.08) ml·min~(-1)·mi~(-1) respectively, and PVP was (1.09±0.36), (1.03±0.40), (0.91±0.41) ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1), respectively, and TLP was (1.26±0.38), (1.23±0.40), (1.17±0.44) ml·min~(-1)·ml~(-1) respectively, and HPI was (14.04±6.71)%, (17.26±7.86)%, (23.93±8.96)%, respectively. The difference of HAP and HPI at different stage of TACE was significant (F = 10.78, 13.05, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference both PVP and TLP (F = 1.73,0.39, P > 0.05). The difference of PVP and TLP between the control and PGE1 group was significant after first TACE(t = -2.37, -2.14, P <0.05)and second TACE (t = 2.55, - 4.49, P < 0.05) In addition, after the second TACE, the HAP and HPI were also significantly different (t = - 3.41,5.09, P < 0.05). Conclusions PVP and TLP decrease while HAP and HPI increase after TACE. Lipo-PGE1 improves hepatic peffusion after TACE, exerting its greatest effect by increasing portal vein perfusion. Consequently, treatment with Lipo-PGE1 appears to increase liver tissue perfusion and thereby alleviate injury induced by TACE.
Keywords:Liver neoplasms  Chemoembelization  therapeutic  Perfusion  Tomography  X-ray computed
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号