Rehabilitation Outcome in Patients With Lower Limb Amputations Because of Arterial Occlusive Disease: Is it Worth Trying for the Lowest Possible Amputation Level? A Prospective Study

A policy of maximizing the ratio of below-knee to above-knee amputations in patients with severe nonsalvageable limb ischemia is followed. The value of this policy is examined. All the patients that were amputated in our department between 1995 and 1997 were followed up for 2 years after the operation. We correlated the amputation level with 6 different parameters: primary or secondary amputation, perioperative mortality, 2-years mortality, amputation stump healing, artificial limb fitment, and rehabilitation outcome. The results were analyzed statistically. A total of 64 patients were included in the study. The revision rate was 38% in below-knee amputees and 4% in above-knee amputees. The perioperative mortality was 22%. Two years after operation, the limb fitment rate in below-knee amputees was 95% and in above-knee amputees was 64%. The overall artificial limb fitment rate was 50%. A total of 47.6% of the living patients were capable to walk out of their house. Artificial limb fitment and rehabilitation status are greater after a below-knee than an above-knee amputation. Although the morbidity may be higher in below knee procedures, it is worth trying for the lowest level of amputation because of the better rehabilitation results in these patients.