首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

吉西他滨治疗复发转移性晚期鼻咽癌的系统评价
引用本文:衷敬华,刘瑞林,陈晶,张积仁,胡喜钢,王黎青,王勇.吉西他滨治疗复发转移性晚期鼻咽癌的系统评价[J].循证医学,2009,9(3):161-167.
作者姓名:衷敬华  刘瑞林  陈晶  张积仁  胡喜钢  王黎青  王勇
作者单位:南方医科大学珠江医院,信息科,广州,510282;南方医科大学珠江医院,药剂科,广州,510282;南方医科大学珠江医院,医院办公室,广州,510282;南方医科大学珠江医院,肿瘤科,广州,510282
基金项目:广东省科技计划项目,广东省自然科学基金,国家自然科学基金 
摘    要:目的评价吉西他滨在晚期鼻咽癌治疗中的临床疗效,一线及二线治疗中的地位。方法采用Cochrane系统评价方法,检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验数据库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、OVID、CBM、CNKI和EBSCO等电子数据库。检索时间截至2008年3月。由2名评价者独立评价并交叉核对纳入研究质量,对同质研究采用RevMan4.2.8软件进行分析。结果共纳入8个研究,482例晚期鼻咽癌患者。分析结果表明,GP方案(吉西他滨+顺铂)与FP方案(氟尿嘧啶+顺铂)的1年生存率、3年生存率相似,但GP方案具有更高的总缓解率相对危险度1.13,95%可信区间(1.02,1.25),P=0.02];GP方案(吉西他滨+顺铂)比GEM(单药吉西他滨)有更高的缓解率相对危险度1.81,95%可信区间(1.06,3.08),P=0.03]和1年生存率相对危险度1.78,95%可信区间(1.03,3.06),P=0.04],但3年生存率相似;GEM+CBP方案(吉西他滨联合卡铂)与DOC+DDP方案(紫杉醇联合顺铂)相比,具有更高的缓解率P〈0.01;吉西他滨不同的给药方式比较,动脉灌注的缓解率(P=0.013)、1年生存率(P=0.018)、中位生存时间均(P=0.013)高于静脉滴注。结论吉西他滨治疗晚期鼻咽癌有确切临床疗效,无论是单药还是与其他药物的联合用药均具有与当前一线经典方案相当的疗效。

关 键 词:鼻咽肿瘤  吉西他滨  药物疗法  系统评价

A Systematic Review of Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
ZHONG Jing-hua,LIU Rui-lin,CHEN Jing,ZHANG Ji-ren,HU Xi-gang,WANG Li-qing,WANG Yong.A Systematic Review of Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma[J].The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2009,9(3):161-167.
Authors:ZHONG Jing-hua  LIU Rui-lin  CHEN Jing  ZHANG Ji-ren  HU Xi-gang  WANG Li-qing  WANG Yong
Institution:1. Department of Pharmacy; 2. Administrative Department; 3. Department of Information; 4. Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the role of Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).nethods Up to 2008, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, CBM, CNKI, and EBSCO. The quality of included studies was evaluated and analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies by RevMan 4.2.8 software. Results 8 studies involving 482 participants with NPC were included. Analyses showed that 1 and 3 year survival rate of GP (Gemcitabine + Cisplatin) regimen had no significant difference compared with FP regimen (Fluorouracil + Cisplatin), but had higher remission rate RR=1.13, 95%CI(1.02,1.25) P=0.02]; The response rate and 1 year survival rate of GP (Gemeitabine + Cisplatin) regimen was higher than that of monotherapy with Gemcitabine RR=1.81, 95%CI(1.06,3.08), P=0.03] , RR=1.78, 95%CI(1.03,3.06), P=0.04], but it had no significant difference between the two regimens in 3 year survival rate; the remission rate of GEM+CBP (Gemcitabine + Carboplatin) regimen was significant higher compared with DOC + DDP regimen (Paclitaxel + Cisplatin) (P〈0.01). Compared with different mode of administration, there is higher response rate(P=0.013), 1 year survival rate (P=0.018), and longer median survival time(P=0.013) when Gemcitabine was administered by artery than venous. Conclusions Gemcitabine is an effective agent for NPC whatever used as monotherapy or combined treatment.
Keywords:nasopharyngeal neoplasms  Gemcitabine  chemotherapy  systematic review
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《循证医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《循证医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号