Efficacy comparison of ustekinumab between anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐naïve and anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐resistant Japanese psoriasis cases

Ustekinumab is highly efficacious for psoriasis; however, it has not been fully clarified whether previous failure in anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) therapy affects the treatment response with ustekinumab. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab in anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases and compared the clinical efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab in biologic naïve cases. Thirty‐five patients with plaque psoriasis who showed resistance to conventional therapies were enrolled; 26 patients, who had never been treated with biologics, were allocated to ustekinumab or adalimumab; nine patients who failed to achieve psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 50 at week 16 with one or two TNF‐α antagonists were switched to ustekinumab. The end of the study was defined as 52 weeks after starting the first biologic for anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients and after switching to ustekinumab for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant patients. The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of patients achieving PASI75 at week 16. In patients treated with ustekinumab, 87.5% of anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and 77.8% of anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases achieved a PASI75 response at week 16, and no statistically significant difference was found between the treatment response rates (P = 0.60). When comparing the treatment efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab among anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients, there was also no statistically significant difference in PASI75 achievement rates (87.5 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.79). Our study suggests that ustekinumab can be considered as a first‐line biologic for psoriasis and a rescue therapy for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases.