A comparison of enflurane and propofol in thoracic surgery

Comparisons between propofol and inhalational anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia are limited. The purpose of our prospective study was to examine differences between enflurane and propofol during pulmonary resections with one-lung ventilation (1LV). METHOD. 28 patients, ASA risk group II-III, gave written informed consent for inclusion in this institutionally approved study. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: A: propofol 10 mg kg-1 h-1, B: 1 MAC enflurane, for maintenance of anesthesia. In both groups analgesia was achieved by fentanyl and muscle relaxation, by pancuronium. Ventilation via a double-lumen tube was controlled (FiO2 = 1.0, PaCO2 35-40 mmHg). Measurements, including hemodynamics and arterial and mixed venous blood gases, were obtained before induction (I), during two-lung ventilation (2LV) 15 min after induction in the supine position (II) and 20 min after surgical opening of the chest in the lateral decubitus position (III), 20 min after starting 1LV (IV), and after extubation (V). RESULTS. No significant differences between the two groups were found before induction (I), during 2LV (II, III), or after extubation (V). The only significant differences between the two groups were observed during 1LV (IV): the shunt fraction was 33.9 +/- 2.5% in A and 38.5 +/- 2.6% in B (P less than or equal to 0.05). Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was not inhibited in A, but was inhibited by 21.5% in group B during 1LV. Since no case of hypoxemia occurred in group A during 1LV (range of PaO2: 75.2-417.0 mmHg), but four patients developed hypoxemia in group B (Range of PaO2: 46.6-431.0 mmHg), regimen A might be of value in high-risk patients during thoracic surgery when 1LV is planned.