首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的临床观察
引用本文:余祖善,缪荣华.胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的临床观察[J].药物流行病学杂志,2014(4):208-210.
作者姓名:余祖善  缪荣华
作者单位:台州市立医院心内科(浙江台州 318000);台州市立医院心内科(浙江台州 318000)
摘    要:目的:探讨胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的临床效果。方法: 78例急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的患者随机分为胺碘酮组和利多卡因组各39例,分别给予胺碘酮和利多卡因治疗。根据24 h动态心电图观察两组治疗后7 d 24 h内室性心律失常发作次数、QRS波时间、PR间期,比较两组疗效和不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,胺碘酮组总有效率为94.87%,明显高于利多卡因组82.05%(P〈0.05);两组在室性心律失常发作次数、QRS波时间上均较治疗前明显改善,且胺碘酮组改善情况明显优于利多卡因组(P〈0.05);胺碘酮组不良反应发生率为17.95%,明显低于利多卡因组33.33%(P〈0.05)。结论: 胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常安全有效,可显著提高治愈率,减少病死率,且不良反应明显低于利多卡因,值得临床推广。

关 键 词:急性心肌梗死  室上性心律失常  胺碘酮  利多卡因

Clinical Study of Amiodarone in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Arrhythmia
Yu Zushan and Miao Ronghua.Clinical Study of Amiodarone in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Arrhythmia[J].Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology,2014(4):208-210.
Authors:Yu Zushan and Miao Ronghua
Institution:Cardiology,Taizhou Municipal Hospital,Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, Chian;Cardiology,Taizhou Municipal Hospital,Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, Chian
Abstract:Objective::To evaluate the clinical efficacy of amiodarone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia. Methods:78 acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia patients were selected in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012, and were randomly divided into amiodarone group and lidocaine group with 39 cases in each group. The therapeutic effect was observed according to 24h dynamic electrocardiogram in the two groups after treatment, and 24h chamber arrhythmia time frequency, QRS wave (s), PR interval (s) and the occurrence of adverse reactions, observed after treatment. Results:After the treatment, the total effective rate was significantly higher (94.87%) in amiodarone group, than that (82.05%) in lidocaine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05); after treatment, the onset times of the two groups and QRS waves of ventricular arrhythmias were significantly improved, and the improving condition of amiodarone group was obviously better than that of lidocaine group, and there was significant difference (P〈0.05); the incidence of adverse reaction was significantly lower (17.95%) in amiodarone group than that (33.33%) in lidocaine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion:Amiodarone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia was safe and effective, and could significantly improve the cure rate of the patients, reduce the mortality rate with fewer adverse reactions than lidocaine, and was therefore worth the clinical promotion.
Keywords:Acute myocardial infarction  Ventricular arrhythmia  Amiodarone  Lidocaine
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号