首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Guided Local Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Authors:Arash Babaei-Ghazani  Peyman Roomizadeh  Bijan Forogh  Seyed-Mohammad Moeini-Taba  Amin Abedini  Mona Kadkhodaie  Fateme Jahanjoo  Bina Eftekharsadat
Affiliation:1. Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;2. Medical Students Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;3. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:

Objective

To review the literature and assess the comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided local corticosteroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Data Sources

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science (from inception to February 1, 2017).

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound-guided injection with landmark-guided injection in patients with CTS were included.

Data Extraction

Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts. The outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and 4 electrodiagnostic parameters, including compound muscle action potential (CMAP), sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), distal motor latency (DML), and distal sensory latency (DSL).

Data Synthesis

Overall, 569 abstracts were retrieved and checked for eligibility; finally, 3 RCTs were included (181 injected hands). Pooled analysis showed that ultrasound-guided injection was more effective in SSS improvement (mean difference [MD], ?.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?.59 to ?.32; P<.00001), whereas no significant difference was observed between the 2 methods in terms of the FSS (MD, ?.25; 95% CI, ?.56 to .05; P=.10). There were also no statistically significant differences in improvements of CMAP (MD, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.01 to 3.07; P=.05), SNAP (MD, ?0.02; 95% CI, ?6.27 to 6.23; P>.99), DML (MD, .05; 95% CI, ?.30 to .39; P=.80), or DSL (MD, .00; 95% CI, ?.65 to .65; P>.99).

Conclusions

This review suggested that ultrasound-guided injection was more effective than landmark-guided injection in symptom severity improvement in patients with CTS; however, no significant differences were observed in functional status or electrodiagnostic improvements between the 2 methods.
Keywords:Carpal tunnel syndrome  Conservative treatment  Injections  Meta-analysis [publication type]  Rehabilitation  Review [publication type]  Ultrasonography  BCTQ  Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire  CI  confidence interval  CMAP  compound muscle action potential  CTS  carpal tunnel syndrome  DML  distal motor latency  DSL  distal sensory latency  FSS  Functional Status Scale  MD  mean difference  RCT  randomized controlled trial  SNAP  sensory nerve action potential  SSS  Symptom Severity Scale
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号