Return to sport following scaphoid fractures:A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| |
Authors: | Joaquim S Goffin Quintin Liao Gregory AJ Robertson |
| |
Affiliation: | Joaquim S Goffin, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD2 1SY, United KingdomQuintin Liao, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert FK5 4WR, United KingdomGregory AJ Robertson, Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland EH16 4SA, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND Scaphoid fracture is the most commonly fractured carpal bone in the athletic patient, accounting for over 85% of all sport-related carpal bone fractures, and is particularly common in sports involving high impact injuries to the wrist. The management of such injuries comprises both conservative and surgical techniques, as guided by fracture location and type. Athletes demonstrate a unique challenge with regards to the management of scaphoid fractures due to their requirement to return to sport, as soon as able.AIM To review systemically all studies recording return to sport following scaphoid fractures, to collate information on return rates to sport(RRS) and mean return times(RTS) to sport and to determine differences in sporting outcome for the various treatment methods.METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHAL, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Scopus was performed in August 2018 using the keywords "scaphoid","fracture", "acute", "carpal", "athletes", "sports", "non-operative","conservative", "operative" and "return to sport". All studies that recorded RRS and RTS following scaphoid fractures were included. RTS was recorded as the length of time from commencement of either primary conservative management or primary surgical procedure to return to sport.RESULTS Eleven studies were included: Two randomised controlled trials, six retrospective cohort studies and three case series. Seven studies reported on conservative management(n = 77), and eight studies reported on surgical management(n =83). For conservative management, RRS was 90%(69/77), and the mean RTS was9.6 wk. Three studies allowed to return to sport in cast [RRS 89%(25/28); RTS 1.9 wk], and four studies required completion of cast treatment prior to returning to sport [RRS 90%(44/49); RTS 13.9 wk]. Four studies recorded fracture union data:Union rate 85%(47/55); mean time to union 14.0 wk. For surgical management,RRS was 98%(81/83), and RTS was 7.3 wk. Three studies reported on Percutaneous Screw Fixation [RRS 97%(32/33); RTS 6.5 wk], and five studies reported on Open Reduction Internal Fixation [RRS 98%(49/50); RTS 7.9 wk]. Six studies recorded fracture union data: Union rate 97%(69/71); mean time to union9.8 wk. On meta-analysis, RRS(RR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval(CI): 1.00-1.18;P 0.045), RTS(MD 2.3 wk; 95%CI: 0.79-3.87; P 0.002), union rates(RR = 1.14;95%CI: 1.01-1.28; P 0.030) and mean times to union(MD 4.2 wk; 95%CI: 3.94-4.36; P 0.001) were all significantly better for the surgical cohort compared to the conservative cohort.CONCLUSION Surgical management of scaphoid fractures can provide significantly improved RRS and RTS to sport compared to conservative management. Both treatments,however, remain acceptable options, and athletes should be fully informed of the benefits and risks of both prior to deciding treatment plans. Immediate return to sport in a cast should be avoided due to the significant risk of non-union. |
| |
Keywords: | Acute Fracture Scaphoid Carpal Return Sport Rate Time |
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《World journal of orthopedics》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|