首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

3种用药方案治疗膝关节炎的成本-效果分析
引用本文:嵇宏亮,陆新梅. 3种用药方案治疗膝关节炎的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国药房, 2005, 16(23): 1792-1793
作者姓名:嵇宏亮  陆新梅
作者单位:浙江湖州市第三人民医院,湖州市,313000
摘    要:目的:评价3种用药方案治疗膝关节炎的疗效及成本-效果。方法:对A(玻璃酸钠)、B(玻璃酸钠+复方倍他米松)、C(玻璃酸钠+醋酸曲安奈德)3种用药方案进行成本-效果分析。结果:A、B、C方案成本分别为956·5元、1206元、998·5元;有效率分别为79·2%、91·3%、96·4%;成本-效果比分别为12·08、13·21、10·36;B、C方案相对于A方案的增量成本-效果比分别为20·62、2·44。结论:C方案为较佳治疗方案。

关 键 词:膝关节炎  用药方案  成本-效果分析
文章编号:1001-0408(2005)23-1792-02
收稿时间:2005-09-01
修稿时间:2005-11-10

Treating Gonarthritis with 3 Therapeutic Regimens: Cost - effectiveness Analysis
JI Hongliang,LU Xinmei. Treating Gonarthritis with 3 Therapeutic Regimens: Cost - effectiveness Analysis[J]. China Pharmacy, 2005, 16(23): 1792-1793
Authors:JI Hongliang  LU Xinmei
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects and cost-effectiveness of 3 therapeutic regimens in the treatment of gonarthritis. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted among 3 therapeutic regimens: regimen A(sodium hyaluronate), regimen B(sodium hyaluronate plus compound betamethasone) and regimen C(sodium hyaluron_ate plus triamcinolone acetonide acetate). RESULTS: The total costs for Group A, B and C were 956.5 yuan, 1 206 yuan and 998.5 yuan, respectively. The effective rates were 79.2%, 91.3% and 96.4%, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios were 12.08, 13.21 and 10.36 respectively. As compared with regimen A, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for regimen B and C were 20.62 and 2.44 respectively. CONCLUSION: Regimen C is more preferable among the three therapeutic regimens.
Keywords:Gonarthritis  Therapeutic regimen  Cost-effectiveness analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号