首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection
Authors:Kevin C. McCammack  Natalie M. Schenker-Ahmed  Nathan S. White  Shaun R. Best  Robert M. Marks  Jared Heimbigner  Christopher J. Kane  J. Kellogg Parsons  Joshua M. Kuperman  Hauke Bartsch  Rahul S. Desikan  Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner  Michael A. Liss  Daniel J. A. Margolis  Steven S. Raman  Ahmed Shabaik  Anders M. Dale  David S. Karow
Affiliation:1.Department of Radiology,University of California San Diego School of Medicine,San Diego,USA;2.Department of Radiology,Naval Medical Center San Diego,San Diego,USA;3.Department of Urology,University of California San Diego School of Medicine,San Diego,USA;4.Department of Urology,University of Texas San Antonio School of Medicine,San Antonio,USA;5.Department of Radiology,University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine,Los Angeles,USA;6.Department of Pathology,University of California San Diego School of Medicine,San Diego,USA;7.Department of Neurosciences,University of California San Diego School of Medicine,San Diego,USA
Abstract:

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), with that of conventional multi-parametric (MP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in a blinded reader-based format.

Methods

Three readers independently evaluated 100 patients (67 with proven PCa) who underwent MP-MRI and RSI within 6 months of systematic biopsy (N = 67; 23 with targeting performed) or prostatectomy (N = 33). Imaging was performed at 3 Tesla using a phased-array coil. Readers used a five-point scale estimating the likelihood of PCa present in each prostate sextant. Evaluation was performed in two separate sessions, first using conventional MP-MRI alone then immediately with MP-MRI and RSI in the same session. Four weeks later, another scoring session used RSI and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) without conventional diffusion-weighted or dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Reader interpretations were then compared to prostatectomy data or biopsy results. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed, with area under the curve (AUC) used to compare across groups.

Results

MP-MRI with RSI achieved higher AUCs compared to MP-MRI alone for identifying high-grade (Gleason score greater than or equal to 4 + 3=7) PCa (0.78 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level; P < 0.001 and 0.85 vs. 0.79 at the hemigland level; P = 0.04). RSI and T2WI alone achieved AUCs similar to MP-MRI for high-grade PCa (0.71 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level). With hemigland analysis, high-grade disease results were similar when comparing RSI + T2WI with MP-MRI, although with greater AUCs compared to the sextant analysis (0.80 vs. 0.79).

Conclusion

Including RSI with MP-MRI improves PCa detection compared to MP-MRI alone, and RSI with T2WI achieves similar PCa detection as MP-MRI.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号