首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

认知问卷(CQ)的中文修订
引用本文:袁洁,薛云珍. 认知问卷(CQ)的中文修订[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2009, 17(7): 872-874
作者姓名:袁洁  薛云珍
作者单位:中国.山西医科大学医学心理学教研室,太原市,030001;中国.山西医科大学医学心理学教研室,太原市,030001
摘    要:目的对Fennell认知问卷(CQ)进行中文修订,并考察其信度和效度。方法在完成问卷修订和预备测试的基础上,选取600名大学生进行了CQ和Beck抑郁量表(BDI)的测试,其中150名学生2周后参加了复测。分析中文修订版问卷的信、效度。结果问卷的内部一致性信度和重测信度比较理想,修订版的CQ总体信度达到0.80,验证性因素分析支持CQ的5维度模型,且构成各维度的题目也同原版问卷相同。结论该CQ中文修订版具有较高的信度和效度,可以作为大学生认知风格的测量工具。

关 键 词:认知问卷  抑郁  信度  效度

Chinese Version of Cognitions Questionnaire.
Yuan Jie,Xue Yunzhen. Chinese Version of Cognitions Questionnaire.[J]. china journal of health psychology, 2009, 17(7): 872-874
Authors:Yuan Jie  Xue Yunzhen
Affiliation:.( Shanxi Medical University , Taiyuan 030001,P. R. China )
Abstract:Objective To revise Fennell Cognitions Questionnaire (CQ) and examine its r-eliability and validity. Methods Based on finishing the recension, as well as the preparation test, 600 university students were measured with Cognitions Question-naire (CQ) and B--eck Depression Inventory (BDI), and 150 students of them participated the retest after two weeks. Then we analyzed its reliability and validity. Results The internal consistency reliability and the retest reliability of the questionnaire was satisfactory. The total alpha coefficient got at 0. 80. Confirmatory factor analysis verified five dimension models of the CQ, and the items of each dimension were as same as the original version. Conclusion The revised Chinese Version of the Cognitions Questionnaire (CQ) has good reliability and validity,which can be applied in research for cognitive style of university students.
Keywords:Cognitions questionnaire  Depression  Reliability  Validity
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号