改良森田疗法与安眠药物对慢性原发性失眠症治疗效果对比分析

目的比较改良森田疗法和安眠药物对慢性原发性失眠症的治疗效果。方法将91例慢性原发性失眠症患者分成3组,A组单纯药物治疗;B组单纯改良森田治疗;C组为安眠药物合并改良森田疗法治疗,疗程12周。于治疗前后分别用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQ I）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评定疗效,半年后再随访。结果安眠药物治疗失眠起效快,短期效果好;森田疗法不但改善患者睡眠质量,而且能改善与失眠相关的心理状态,远期疗效较好且优于联合组。结论改良森田疗法是治疗慢性原发性失眠症的较好方法。

Comparative Morita Therapy and Sleeping Pills in the Treatment of Chronic Primary Insomnia Analysis

Objective Comparison of Modified Morita therapy and sleeping pills in the treatment of chronic primary insomnia. Methods A total of 91 cases with chronic primary insomnia patients were divided into 3 groups： A group-Simple drug therapy, B group-Modified Morita therapy and C groups-sleeping pills combined with Morita therapy. The period of treatment was 12 weeks. Before and after treatment,Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index （PSQ I）, self-rating anxiety scale （SAS） and self-rating depression scale （SDS） were used to assess the efficacy. Following-up was conducted after six months. Results Sleeping pills treated insomnia with fast action and short-term effect Morita therapy could not only improve sleep quality of the patients with insomnia, but dso improve insomnia associated psychological status and its long-term efficacy was superior to the join group. Conclusion Morita therapy is a better treatment method for chronic primary insomnia.