| Abstract: | In 176 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to N.V. Sklifosofsky institute of urgent aid in 2003-20007 we compared efficacy of 3 strategies of treatment after unsuccessful thrombolytic therapy (TLT): percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during first 24 hours (n = 30), PCI on days 2 or 3 (n = 38); conservative treatment (n = 108). The data obtained show that it is expedient to consider absence of 50% reduction of STAsegment elevations in 90 min after start of TLT as indication to urgent late PCI when possibilities for immediate intervention after unsuccessful thrombolysis are lacking. Alternative reperfusion is the only type of effective treatment of patients with failed pharmacological reperfusion. Necessity to perform PCI during first 12 hours after unsuccessful TLT does not exclude possibility of its later fulfillment in acute period of myocardial infarction. Efficacy of the latter is comparable with success rate of rescue PCI. The use of both invasive strategies has allowed to lessen rate of complications and prevent lethal outcomes. Success of late urgent interventions in acute period of infarction after failed thrombolysis opens possibilities for their active use in patients transferred from other hospitals. |
