首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

高龄患者主动脉瓣置换的手术风险及疗效分析
引用本文:胡馗,洪涛,王春生,丁文军,夏利民,赵东,杨兆华,陆树洋.高龄患者主动脉瓣置换的手术风险及疗效分析[J].复旦学报(医学版),2013,40(6):704.
作者姓名:胡馗  洪涛  王春生  丁文军  夏利民  赵东  杨兆华  陆树洋
作者单位:复旦大学附属中山医院心外科 上海 20032
摘    要: 目的 总结高龄患者主动脉瓣置换的手术风险和远期疗效,探讨同期手术的处理原则。方法 回顾性分析61例75岁以上行主动脉瓣置换术患者的临床资料,其中男44例,女17例,年龄75~84岁[(77.5±2.1)岁],术前心功能分级(采用美国NYHA分级) Ⅱ级11例,Ⅲ、Ⅳ级50例。根据是否合并其他手术(冠脉搭桥术等)分为单纯组和合并组。单纯组33例,合并组28例。结果 全组住院死亡率6.6% (4/61),术后低心排是住院死亡的独立危险因素,术后主要并发症发生率45.9%。合并组体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间长于单纯组,使用血浆的量多于单纯组;两组在住院死亡率、术后并发症发生率、术后住院时间、ICU时间、远期生存情况等方面无显著差异。出院后的随访率92.9%,随访时间2~105个月[(34±28)个月],1、3、5、8年生存率分别为93.9%、88.7%、69.4%、41.6%。合并组与单纯组1、3、5、8年生存率分别为100%、87.5%、52.5%、52.5%与89.2%、80.3%、80.3%、40.2% (P=0.796)。结论 75岁以上高龄患者主动脉瓣置换手术死亡率及术后并发症发生率较高,但术后远期疗效满意,同期处理合并手术并不明显增加手术风险,也不影响远期疗效。

关 键 词:主动脉瓣置换术  高龄  手术风险  疗效  同期手术
收稿时间:2013-01-30

Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Surgical risk and outcome
HU Kui,HONG Tao,WANG Chun-sheng,DING Wen-jun,XIA Li-min,ZHAO Dong,YANG Zhao-hua,LU Shu-yang.Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Surgical risk and outcome[J].Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences,2013,40(6):704.
Authors:HU Kui  HONG Tao  WANG Chun-sheng  DING Wen-jun  XIA Li-min  ZHAO Dong  YANG Zhao-hua  LU Shu-yang
Institution:Department of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan Universery, Shanghai 20032, China
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate operative risk factors,early and long-term results of isolated aortic valve and aortic valve replacement combined with other procedures in patients above 75 years old. Methods A retrospective review was performed over the clinical data of 61 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (group I, n=33) or aortic valve replacement combination with other procedures [coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), mitral valve repair, et al.] (group C, n=28), including 44 males and 17 females, aged from 75 to 84 years [(77.5±2.1) years]. The preoperative cardiac functions of 11 cases were graded as NYHA class Ⅱ, and 50 cases NYHA class Ⅲ or Ⅳ. Results The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.6% (4/61), postoperative low cardiac output being an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. The main postoperative complications rate was 45.9%. Group C had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time than group I, and used more plasma after operation. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of in-hospital mortality, postoperative complication incidence, ICU stays, postoperative hospital stays or long-term surviving state after surgery, etc. Fifty-three out of 57 (92.9%) patients were followed up after discharge with a period of 2-105 months [(34±28) months], the overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year survival rates were 93.9%, 88.7%, 69.4%, 41.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year survival rates were 100%, 87.5%, 52.5%, 52.5% and 89.2%, 80.3%, 80.3%, 40.2% in group C and group I, respectively (P=0.796). Conclusions Patients aged 75 and above who underwent aortic valve replacement have acceptable short and long-term outcome despite of a high surgical risk and a high incidence of postoperative complications. Concomitant CABG and other procedures do not significantly increase the risk of surgery or affect the long-term outcome.
Keywords:aortic valve replacement  elderly  surgical risk  treatment outcome  concomitant operation
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号