腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与应用UHS无张力疝修补术的对比研究

目的研究比较腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与应用轻量型超普疝装置(UHS)补片无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2009年3月至2011年1月年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术87例,应用轻量型UHS补片无张力疝修补术53例的临床资料,分析比较手术时间、住院天数、并发症发生率、恢复正常生活和工作时间、术后短期复发率等指标。结果手术时间、术后住院天数、并发症发生率、恢复正常生活和工作时间、术后短期复发率等指标两组相比差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与应用UHS补片无张力疝修补术两种无张力修补方法治疗腹股沟疝均可取得满意疗效。

A clinical control study of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair vs inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh. Methods Eighty seven patients with inguinal hernia were performed with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair including 50 cases received transabdominal extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 37 cases received totally extraperitoneal technique for repair during the period from March 2009 to January 2011, and 53 patients underwent open inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The average operating time, duration of hospitalization, rate of complications, duration for recovery and short - term recurrence rate in both groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference found in average operating time, duration of hospitalization, duration for recovery and short - term recurrence rate between these two groups. The operating time with laparoscopy was longer than that with UHS mesh. Conclusion The laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh had the similar curative effect if the technical standard was strictly mastered.