Impact of fremanezumab on disability outcomes in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: a pooled analysis of phase 3 studies |
| |
Authors: | Peter McAllister Joshua M. Cohen Verena Ramirez Campos Xiaoping Ning Lindsay Janka Steve Barash |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.New England Institute for Neurology and Headache – Neurology, 30 Buxton Farm Road, Suite 230, Stamford, CT 06905 USA ;2.Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA USA |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundMigraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Although many preventive treatments reduce migraine frequency and severity, it is unclear whether these treatments reduce migraine-related disability in a clinically meaningful way. This pooled analysis evaluated the ability of fremanezumab to reduce migraine-related disability, based on responses and shifts in severity in patient-reported disability outcomes.MethodsThis pooled analysis included 3 double-blind phase 3 trials (HALO EM, HALO CM, FOCUS) in which patients with episodic or chronic migraine were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to quarterly or monthly fremanezumab or matched placebo for 12 weeks. Migraine-related disability was assessed using the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaires. A clinically meaningful improvement in disability was defined per American Headache Society guidelines: for HIT-6, a ≥ 5-point reduction; for MIDAS, a ≥ 5-point reduction when baseline score was 11 to 20 or ≥ 30% reduction when baseline score was > 20. Proportions of patients who demonstrated shifts in severity for each outcome were also evaluated.ResultsFor patients with baseline MIDAS scores of 11 to 20 (n = 234), significantly higher proportions achieved 5-point reductions from baseline in MIDAS scores with fremanezumab (quarterly, 71%; monthly, 70%) compared with placebo (49%; both P ≤ 0.01). For patients with baseline MIDAS scores of > 20 (n = 1266), proportions achieving ≥30% reduction from baseline in MIDAS scores were also significantly higher with fremanezumab (quarterly, 69%; monthly, 79%) compared with placebo (58%; both P < 0.001). For HIT-6 scores, proportions of patients achieving 5-point reductions from baseline were significantly higher with fremanezumab (quarterly, 53%; monthly, 55%) compared with placebo (39%; both P < 0.0001). Proportions of patients with shifts of 1 to 3 grades down in MIDAS or HIT-6 disability severity were significantly greater with quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compared with placebo (all P < 0.0001).ConclusionFremanezumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in disability severity in this pooled analysis.Trial registrationsHALO CM, {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02621931","term_id":"NCT02621931"}}NCT02621931; HALO EM, {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02629861","term_id":"NCT02629861"}}NCT02629861; FOCUS, {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT03308968","term_id":"NCT03308968"}}NCT03308968. |
| |
Keywords: | Migraine Disability MIDAS HIT-6 Fremanezumab Preventive |
|
|