首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像多b值在乳腺良恶病变诊断中的价值
引用本文:田浩,吴献华,李敏达,周学军,顾红梅,赵金丽. 3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像多b值在乳腺良恶病变诊断中的价值[J]. 中国交通医学杂志, 2013, 0(5): 461-464,467
作者姓名:田浩  吴献华  李敏达  周学军  顾红梅  赵金丽
作者单位:南通大学附属医院影像科,江苏226001
摘    要:目的:探讨3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像多b值在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法:分析乳腺良恶性病灶48个,测量病灶在不同b值(600、1000、1500s/mm2)下的ADC值并进行统计学分析。以病理诊断为金标准,采用ROC曲线获得曲线下面积(AUC)及最佳临界点,分析不同b值下ADC值诊断价值。结果:同一b值下乳腺良性、恶性病变的ADC值与不同b值下乳腺良性、恶性病变 ADC值间差异均有统计学意义。采用ROC曲线分析方法显示:b=600s/mm2时,AUC为0.882,最佳临界点为1.43×10-3mm2/s,诊断的敏感性88.9%、特异性71.4%;b=1000s/mm2时,AUC为0.897,最佳临界点为1.19×10-3mm2/s,诊断的敏感性为77.8%、特异性为81.0%;b=1500s/mm2时,AUC为0.915,最佳临界点为1.04×10-3mm2/s,诊断的敏感性为70.4%、特异性为90.5%。结论:(1)ADC值定量分析有助于乳腺良、恶性病变的鉴别,同质病变ADC值随着b值的增大而变小。(2)以ROC曲线分析得到的最佳临界点作为诊断恶性病变的阈值,随着b值的增加,诊断的敏感性下降,特异性增加。

关 键 词:乳腺病变  乳腺癌  磁共振扩散加权成像  表观弥散系数值  受试者工作特征曲线

The clinical value of diffusion weighted imaging with multiple b value at 3T MR in diagnosis of breast diseases
TIAN Hao,WU Xianhua,LI Minda,ZHOU Xuejun,GU Hongmei,ZHAO Jinli. The clinical value of diffusion weighted imaging with multiple b value at 3T MR in diagnosis of breast diseases[J]. Chinese Medical JOurnal of Communications, 2013, 0(5): 461-464,467
Authors:TIAN Hao  WU Xianhua  LI Minda  ZHOU Xuejun  GU Hongmei  ZHAO Jinli
Affiliation:(Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu 226001)
Abstract:Objective:To study the clinical value of diffusion weighted imaging with multiple b value at 3T MR in differentiation of benign and malignant breast diseases. Methods:48 benign and malignant breast lesions were used for as-sessment. The ADC of the lesions at different b values (600、1000、1500s/mm2) was measured, respectively for further eval-uation. Pathological findings were considered as the reference standard. ROC analysis was used to calculate the area under curve (AUC) as well as the best cut-off value for differentiation. The diagnostic performance of ADC at different b values was determined accordingly. Results: ADC measurements of benign breast lesions differed significantly from malignant le-sions both at the same and different b-values. With comparison to pathological results, the AUC was 0.882 and best cut-off was 1.43 ×10-3mm2/s when b value was 600s/mm2. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity for differentiation were 88.9% and 71.4%, respectively. The AUC was 0.897 and best cut-off was 1.19×10-3mm2/s when b value was 1000s/mm2. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity for differentiation were 77.8%and 81%, respectively. The AUC was 0.915 and best cut-off was 1.04×10-3mm2/s when b value was 1500s/mm2. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity for differentia-tion were 70.4% and 90.5%, respectively. Conclusion: ADC measurement is helpful for differentiation of benign and ma-lignant breast lesions. ADC decreases when b value increases. The best cut-off for lesion differentiation can be originated from ROC analysis. With the increase of b value, the sensitivity decreases and specificity increases.
Keywords:breast lesions, breast Cancer  magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion weighted imaging  apparent diffu-sion coefficient  region of interest
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号