首次剖宫产术式对高龄孕妇再次剖宫产手术的影响分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 池鸿斐,;赵小峰. 首次剖宫产术式对高龄孕妇再次剖宫产手术的影响分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2014, 0(7): 15-17 |
| |
作者姓名: | 池鸿斐, 赵小峰 |
| |
作者单位: | [1]瑞安市妇幼保健院妇产科,浙江温州325200; [2]浙江省人民医院妇科,杭州310014 |
| |
基金项目: | 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2011KYB125). |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:分析首次剖宫产术式对高龄孕妇再次剖宫产手术的影响,指导远期安全性更佳的首次剖宫产术式的选择.方法:选取我院2010年9月至2013年9月收治的再次行剖宫产高龄产妇277例,按照其首次剖宫产术式分为传统腹壁纵切口A组(n=151)及新式腹壁横切口B组(n =126),比较两组孕妇再次剖宫产的妊娠结局.结果:A组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间均低于B组,两组数据比较存在统计学差异(P<0.05);A组孕妇共发生78例腹腔粘连,发生率51.7%,B组发生100例,发生率79.4%,A组腹腔粘连发生率显著低于B组(P<0.05),且其粘连分度亦显著低于后者;A组产后出血5例,发生率3.3%,B组产后出血9例,发生率7.1%,两组新生儿均未发生窒息,两组孕妇产后出血发生率无明显统计学差异(P>0.05).结论:首次剖宫产术式的选择可影响孕妇再次剖宫产并发症的发生率,新式剖宫产术对有再次剖宫产意愿的孕妇风险更高,可导致其手术时间增加、出血量上升、并发症风险增高,而传统剖宫产术可有效规避上述风险.
|
关 键 词: | 剖宫产 术式 高龄孕妇 影响 |
Effect of primary caesarean section on re-caesarean operation of advanced pregnant women |
| |
Affiliation: | CHI Hong-fei, ZHAO Xiaofeng ( 1. Department of Obstetrics and Co'necology, Ruian Maternal and Child Care Hospital, Wenzhou 325200, China; 2. Department of Gynecology, Zhejiang Province People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China) |
| |
Abstract: | Objectives: To analyze the effect of primary cesarean section on re - cesarean operation of ad- vanced pregnant women, guiding the choice of primary cesarean section with better and long - term safety. Methods: 277 advanced pregnant women admitted to our hospital from September 2012 - September 2013 for re - cesarean operation were divided into group A (n = 151 ) and group B (n = 126) according to the primary cesarean section, i.e. those adopted the traditional abdominal vertical incision and new transverse abdominal incision were group A and B respectively. The pregnancy outcome of the two groups was compared after re -cesarean operation. Results: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss anal exhaust time and hospital stays of group A were lower than those of group B, with statistically significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the incidence rate of peritoneal adhesion was 51.7% (78/151) and 79.4% (100/126) respectively, with significantly difference ( P 〈 0.05) ; 5 patients in group A (3.3%) and 9 patients in group B (7.1%) experienced postpartum hemorrhage, with no statistically sig- nificant difference (P 〉 0.05) ; no neonatal asphyxia occurred in the two groups. Conclusion: The primary cesare- an section may affect the incidence rate of complications after re - cesarean operation. Compared with traditional cesarean section, new cesarean section is of higher risks for re - cesarean operation, with increased operation time, intraoperative blood loss and risk of complications. |
| |
Keywords: | Cesarean section Operation Advanced pregnant women Effect |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|