首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美罗培南治疗细菌感染的多中心临床研究
引用本文:刘又宁,王睿,苏炳华. 美罗培南治疗细菌感染的多中心临床研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2000, 10(6): 413-414
作者姓名:刘又宁  王睿  苏炳华
作者单位:解放军总医院,北京
摘    要:目的 评价国产美罗培南的治疗效果与安全性。方法 采用多中心随机对照分层随机分组方法,以进口亚胺培南/西司他丁为对照物,观察两种药物对125例中,重度下呼吸道、泌尿系、烧伤创口感染等的疗效与安全性。结果 实验药对上述疾病总有效率为89.36%,细菌清除率为82.26%,对照药物分别为89.83%与75.00%,副作用发生率分别为7.4%与11.86%。结论 两种药物疗效与副作用发生率相仿。

关 键 词:美罗培南 亚胺培南 细菌感染 安全性 疗效
修稿时间:2000-04-16

Multi Center Clinical Study on Treatment of Bacterial Infections with Meropenem
LIU You ning,WANG Rui,SU Bing hua,JI Shu guo,DUAN Yun you,SUN Tie ying. Multi Center Clinical Study on Treatment of Bacterial Infections with Meropenem[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2000, 10(6): 413-414
Authors:LIU You ning  WANG Rui  SU Bing hua  JI Shu guo  DUAN Yun you  SUN Tie ying
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem. METHODS A randomized comparative multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of domestic meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of 125 cases of moderate and severe lower respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and infection on the surface of wound of burn. RESULTS The clinical effective and bacteriological eradication rates were 89.36% and 82.26%, respectively in meropenem group and those of the control one were 89.83% and 75.00%, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 7.4% of patients in meropenem group and 11.86% in the control one, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences of efficacy and adverse effect between the two groups.
Keywords:Meropenem  Imipenem/cilastatin  Bacterial infections  Randomized comparative method  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号