|
|||||
|
|
| 跖跗关节损伤切开复位内固定术与一期关节融合术的比较 | |
| 引用本文： | James F Kellam,王簕,杨云峰. 跖跗关节损伤切开复位内固定术与一期关节融合术的比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011, 13(12) |
| 作者姓名： | James F Kellam 王簕 杨云峰 |
| 作者单位： | 1. AO Publishing, Switzerland Clavadelerstrasse, CH-7270 Davos Platz 2. 广州医学院第三附属医院骨科 3. 上海同济大学同济医院骨科 |
| 摘 要： | Evidence from two randomized controlled trials suggests a marked increase in the need for reoperation in those receiving ORIF compared with arthrodesis,with a risk increase of approximately 300％.Anatom... |
Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with primary arthrodesis ( Update to 6/07 issue) |
|
| Abstract: | Evidence from two randomized controlled trials suggests a marked increase in the need for reoperation in those receiving ORIF compared with arthrodesis,with a risk increase of approximately 300％.Anatomic reduction was achieved initially by either method, and no definitive conclusions can be made about a preference in terms of functional outcomes although they appear to be better for arthrodesis,or regarding pain. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |