非超声乳化小切口白内障摘出人工晶状体植入

目的对比分析非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的两种不同术式的效果。方法共95例（103眼）中非超声乳化小切口囊外摘出组37例（38眼），超声乳化组58例（65眼），对比观察两种术式的术后视力、散光及并发症。结果非超乳小切口白内障摘出术与超声乳化晶状体吸出术的术后视力、角膜散光及并发症差异无统计学意义。结论非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出及人工晶状体植入术效果好、成本低、适合广大基层医院推广普及。

A study on small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with intraocular lens implantation

Objective To compare small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation with phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation on visual acuity,corneal astigmatism and complications postoperatively. Methods The study population consisted of 95 cases(103 eyes),37 cases(38 eyes) receiving small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation and 58 cases(65 eyes) receiving phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation.To observe visual acuity,corneal astigmatism and postoperative complications of the two groups. Results There have no signification differences between the patients who had received phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation and the patients who had received Small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation on visual acuity,corneal astigmatism and complications postoperatively. Conclusion Small incision non-phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation has good effect,lower cost and it is applicable to the grass roots hospitals extensively.