首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


An investigation into current protocols and radiographer opinions on contrast extravasation in Irish CT departments
Institution:1. Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland;2. Radiology Department, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland;1. University of Salford, Salford, UK;2. Liverpool Vascular & Endovascular Service, Liverpool, UK;3. Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK;1. Guy''s and St Thomas'' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK;2. St George''s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK;1. UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas;2. Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, UTHealth Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
Abstract:BackgroundIodinated contrast extravasation is a serious complication associated with intravenous administration in radiology. Departmental protocols and the radiographer's approach on both prevention techniques and treatment will affect the prevalence of extravasation, and the eventual outcome for the patient when it does occur.AimsTo examine contrast extravasation protocols in place in Irish CT departments for alignment with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines (2014); to establish radiographer's opinions on contrast extravasation; and to examine radiographer adherence to protocols.MethodsContrast extravasation protocols from a purposively selected sample of CT departments across Ireland (n = 6) were compared to ESUR guidelines, followed by an online survey of CT radiographers practicing in the participating centres.ResultsAll participating CT departments (n = 5) had written protocols in place. High risk patients, such as elderly or unconscious, were identified in most protocols, however, children were mentioned in just one protocol and obese patients were not specified in any. The response rate of CT radiographers was 23% (n = 24). 58% (n = 14) of respondents indicated that contrast extravasation was more likely during CTA examinations. While high levels of confidence in managing extravasation were reported, suggested treatment approaches, and confidence in same, was more variable. Clinical workload in CT departments was also identified as a factor impacting on patient care and management.ConclusionWhile contrast extravasation protocols were generally in line with ESUR Guidelines, high risk patients may not be getting sufficient attention. More radiographer awareness of patient monitoring needs, particularly in busy departments with a heavy workload may also reduce extravasation risk, and improve management of same.
Keywords:Cannulation  Computed tomography angiography  Contrast agents  Extravasation  Guidelines  Protocols
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号