How to Avoid Nontherapeutic Laparotomy in Patients With Multiple Organ Failure of Unknown Origin. The Role of CT Scan Revisited

Diagnosis of intra-abdominal diseases in critically ill patients remains a clinical challenge. Physical examination is unreliable whereas exploratory laparotomy may aggravate patient''s condition and delay further evaluation. Only a few studies have investigated the place of computed tomography (CT) on this hazardous situation. We aimed to evaluate the ability of CT to prevent unnecessary laparotomy during the management of critically ill patients. Charts of all consecutive patients who had undergone an emergency nontherapeutic laparotomy from 1996 to 2013 were retrospectively studied and patient''s demographic, clinical characteristics, and surgical findings were collected. During this period 59 patients had an unnecessary laparotomy. Fifty-one patients had at least one preoperative imaging and 36 had a CT scan. CT scans were interpreted to be normal (n = 12), with minor anomalies (n = 10), or major anomalies (pneumoperitoneum, portal venous gas/pneumatosis intestinalis, thickened gallbladder wall, and small bowel obstruction signs). Surgical exploration was performed through laparotomy (n = 55) or laparoscopy. Overall mortality was 37% with a median survival after surgery of 7 days. In univariate analysis, hospitalization in ICU before surgical exploration was the only factor related to death. In our series CT scans, objectively interpreted, helped avoid unnecessary surgical exploration in 61% of our patients.Key words: Laparotomy, Critical care, Abnormalities, Digestive system, CT scansEarly diagnosis of acute nontraumatic life-threatening intra-abdominal diseases remains a clinical challenge. In critically ill patients, pathologies such as mesenteric ischemia, intestinal perforation, pancreatitis and biliary diseases carry a high mortality rate ranging from 50% to 100%.^1,2 For these patients, physical examination can be unreliable due to deep sedation and absence of acute abdomen symptoms, and use of imaging studies may therefore be necessary to identify intra-abdominal pathologies and prevent delay in diagnosis. Also, imaging studies may help avoiding unnecessary laparotomy which can be associated with a morbidity rate up to 22%.³ Ultrasonography (US) can be performed at the bedside and is a good alternative for the diagnosis of biliary tract disease; however, it is highly operator dependent, made difficult by abdominal distension,⁴ and not effective for bowel perforation or ischemia.⁵ Computed tomography (CT) scans are increasingly used for emergency patients with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain and tenderness, however, misinterpretation or overinterpretation of CT findings are not rare.^6,7 Despite the large use of imaging procedures in the evaluation of intra-abdominal pathologies, few studies have attempted to assess their impact on the management of critically ill patients.^8,9 The aim of this observational work was to evaluate the results of preoperative imaging procedures, especially CT, in a consecutive series of nontraumatic critically ill patients who underwent nontherapeutic surgical abdominal exploration in a French university tertiary care hospital.