Antioxidant activity of propolis extracts from Serbia: A polarographic approach |
| |
Authors: | Neboj&scaron a I. Potkonjak,Dragan S. Veselinović,Miroslav M. Novaković,Stanislava Ž. Gorjanović,Lato L. Pezo,Desanka Ž. Sužnjević |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Belgrade, Vin?a Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Chemical Dynamics Laboratory, P.O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia;2. Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 473, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia;3. Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 473, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia;4. Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, P.O. Box 45, 11158 Belgrade 118, Serbia |
| |
Abstract: | Antioxidant activity (AO) of commercial propolis extracts (PEs), available on Serbian market, was determined by direct current (DC) polarography. Polarographic anodic current of 5.0 mmol L−1 alkaline solution of H2O2 was recorded at potentials of mercury dissolution. Decrease of the current was plotted against the volume of gradually added PEs. The volume of PE causing 20% current decrease was determined from the linear part of the plot. Antioxidant activity was expressed in H2O2 equivalent (HPEq), representing the volume of PE that corresponds to 1.0 mmol L−1 H2O2 decrease. Resulting HPEq ranged between 1.71 ± 0.11 and 8.00 ± 0.18 μL. Range of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity was from 0.093 ± 0.004% to 0.346 ± 0.006%. Total phenolic content (TCP) of PE with superior AO activity was 5.31 ± 0.05%g GAE, while the extract with the lowest activity contained 1.45 ± 0.02%g GAE. Antioxidant activity, determined by polarographic method, was correlated with DPPH scavenging activity (R2 = 0.991) and TCP (R2 = 0.985). Validity of obtained results was further confirmed using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD test. |
| |
Keywords: | ANOVA, analysis of variance AO, antioxidant activity BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene CL, Clarc and Lubs i&ndash E, current&ndash potential DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl DC, direct current DME, dropping mercury electrode EC50, efficient concentration EEP, ethanolic extracts of propolis FC, Folin&ndash Ciocalteu GEP, glycolic extract of propolis HSD, honestly significant difference HPEq, hydrogen peroxide equivalent -ΔH2O2, 1.0 mmol L&minus 1 H2O2 decrease ip0, polarographic anodic current PEs, propolis extracts Δip, relative decrease of polarographic anodic current SCE, saturated calomel electrode SD, standard deviation TPC, total phenolic content |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|