Changes in myelinated and unmyelinated axon numbers in the proximal parts of rat sural nerves after two types of injury

Counts of myelinated and unmyelinated axon profiles have been made from normal, uninjured rat sural nerves and from nerves injured 6 months earlier in one of two ways. In one group of rats the nerve was simply cut and left to regenerate, leading to the development of a neuroma in continuity, while in the second group the nerve was cut but then ligated as well to prevent regeneration; this led to stump neuroma formation. After nerve transection and regeneration, with subsequent formation of a neuroma in continuity, there was no change in the number of myelinated axon profiles found 25 mm proximal to the old injury site when compared with control, but there was an 18% reduction (P < 0.05) in the number of unmyelinated axon profiles. Immediately proximal to the injury site the picture was similar, with there still being the same number of myelinated axon profiles as in control material but here the reduction in unmyelinated axon numbers was slightly greater at 24% (P < 0.05). In the proximal part of nerves that had been cut and stump neuroma formation induced there was a large increase (33%) in myelinated axon profiles over and above control values (P < 0.001) but the number of unmyelinated profiles was the same as in controls. Closer to the stump neuroma the number of myelinated axon profiles had increased yet further to be 88% (P < 0.001) above control while the number of unmyelinated ones remained no different from control. Our interpretation of these results is that after nerve transection and regeneration there is no loss of peripheral neurons supporting myelinated axons but some loss of those supporting unmyelinated ones. If a cut nerve is prevented from regenerating and a stump neuroma forms, however, a vigorous sprouting response is triggered in neurons with myelinated axons while those supporting unmyelinated axons are possibly prevented from dying. The reaction of peripheral neurons to injury is such that the number of axons they support varies along the nerve as one goes disto-proximally away from the injury site. Thus discrepancies in results from different laboratories have come about because material for axon counting has been taken from different points along the nerve relative to the injury site and also because the material has been taken from nerves injured in different ways.