Short-term and Midterm Results of Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft in Patients with Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
| |
Authors: | Muhammad Zamir Michael Jenkins Nicholas Burfitt Colin Bicknell Richard Gibbs Mohamad Hamady |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London W21NY, UK;2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London W21NY, UK;3. Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London W21NY, UK |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeTo review short-term and midterm results of the fenestrated Anaconda stent graft in management of patients with pre-existing endovascular aortic stent graft and persistent type 1a endoleak.Materials and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study assessed all consecutive patients with type 1a endoleak and pre-existing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) treated with fenestrated Anaconda stent grafts. Ten patients (9 males; mean age 78 y) with mean follow-up of 22.4 months ± 13 were included. Average aneurysm size was 80.1 mm (range, 62–101 mm). Mean time for conversion to fenestrated EVAR following original EVAR was 53.7 months (range, 22–101 months; median 54 months). Technical and clinical success; anatomic features, including aortic tortuosity, side vessel angulation, and stenosis; complications; and reinterventions were recorded.ResultsThe technical success rate was 90%. There was no open conversion and no 30-day mortality, leading to a clinical success rate of 100%. Five of 10 patients demonstrated an aortic tortuosity index of grade 2 or 3. Additional hostile anatomy that made side vessel catheterization challenging was observed in 15 vessels (45%) with a stenosis of ≥ 50% (related to atherosclerotic disease or struts of indwelling prosthesis) and 21 vessels (66%) with ≤ 70° angulation. Two reinterventions, renal artery stent angioplasty and renal artery covered stent extension, were observed at 2 and 13 months.ConclusionsUse of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft in patients with type 1a endoleaks following previous EVAR is safe, feasible, and offers some technical features that facilitate overcoming certain anatomic difficulties. |
| |
Keywords: | AAA abdominal aortic aneurysm EVAR endovascular aneurysm repair FEVAR fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|