首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A SEER Database Analysis of the Survival Advantage of Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Underutilized Therapy
Authors:Stephen H. Gray  Jared A. White  Peng Li  Meredith L. Kilgore  David T. Redden  Ahmed K. Abdel Aal  Heather N. Simpson  Brendan McGuire  Devin E. Eckhoff  Derek A. Dubay
Affiliation:1. Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama;2. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama;3. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama;4. School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;5. Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
Abstract:

Purpose

To measure transarterial chemoembolization utilization and survival benefit among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) patient population.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study identified 37,832 patients with HCC diagnosed between 1991 and 2011. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Propensity-score matching was used to address an imbalance of covariates.

Results

More than 75% of patients with HCC did not receive any HCC-directed treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization was the most common initial therapy (15.9%). Factors associated with the use of chemoembolization included younger age, more HCC risk factors, more comorbidities, higher socioeconomic status, intrahepatic tumor, unifocal tumor, vascular invasion, and smaller tumor size (all P < .001). Median survival was improved in patients treated with chemoembolization compared with those not treated with chemoembolization (20.1 vs 4.3 mo; P < .0001). Similar findings were demonstrated in propensity-scoring analysis (14.5 vs 4.2 mo; P < .0001) and immortal time bias sensitivity analysis (9.5 vs 3.6 mo; P < .0001). There was a significantly improved survival hazard ratio (HR) in patients treated with chemoembolization (HR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.45).

Conclusions

Patients with HCC treated with transarterial chemoembolization experienced a significant survival advantage compared with those not treated with transarterial chemoembolization. More than 75% of SEER/Medicare patients diagnosed with HCC received no identifiable oncologic treatment. There is a significant public health need to increase awareness of efficacious HCC treatments such as transarterial chemoembolization.
Keywords:CI  confidence interval  HCC  hepatocellular carcinoma  HR  hazard ratio  SEER  Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [database]
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号