梅花针联合黛力新治疗伴抑郁或焦虑状态的慢性紧张型头痛疗效观察

【目的】观察梅花针叩刺联合黛力新治疗伴抑郁或焦虑状态的慢性紧张型头痛的临床疗效。【方法】将60例伴抑郁或(和)焦虑状态的慢性紧张型头痛患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例。治疗组患者给予梅花针叩刺联合黛力新治疗,对照组患者仅给予黛力新治疗,治疗4周后,用头痛症候评分法、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分法和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分法对2组患者治疗前后头痛程度、焦虑情况或抑郁情况进行评估。【结果】经治疗4周后,2组患者的头痛症候评分、HAMA和HAMD评分均较治疗前明显降低(P0.05),且治疗组的降低程度均明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。【结论】对慢性紧张型头痛并伴有抑郁或焦虑状态患者给予梅花针叩刺联合黛力新治疗,疗效显著,其疗效优于单纯黛力新治疗。

Clinical Observation of Plum-blossom Needling Combined with Deanxit for Treatment of Depression or Anxiety in Chronic Tension Headache Patients

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of plum-blossom needling combined with Deanxit for the treatment of depression or anxiety in chronic tension headache patients. Methods Sixty chronic tension headache patients with depression and/or anxiety were randomized into treatment group and control group , 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated by plum-blossom needling combined with oral use of Deanxit , and the control group was treated only by oral use of Deanxit. After treatment for 4 weeks , the scores of headache symptom, Hamilton Depressive Scale (HAMD), and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) of the two groups were observed. Results After treatment , the scores of headache symptom , HAMA and HAMD in all patients were decreased (P < 0 . 05 compared with those before treatment), and the decrease in the treatment group was obviously superior to that in the control group, the difference being significant between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Plum-blossom needling combined with Deanxit shows better effect than Deanxit for the treatment of depression or anxiety in chronic tension headache patients.