首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

恩替卡韦与干扰素治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效
引用本文:潘玉,王莉娜,宋正霞,颜学兵,丁芹.恩替卡韦与干扰素治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效[J].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2016,10(4):392-395.
作者姓名:潘玉  王莉娜  宋正霞  颜学兵  丁芹
作者单位:1. 221006 徐州市,徐州医学院附属医院感染性疾病科
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 81371867); 江苏省高校自然科学基础研究(No. 08KJD320012)
摘    要:目的比较恩替卡韦与干扰素治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效。 方法入组69例患者分成两组,即恩替卡韦组(46例)与干扰素组(23例),收集HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者抗病毒治疗12、24、36和48周时的血清;并检测血清HBV DNA、HBeAg、HBeAb、血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)的含量。 结果在治疗12、24、36、48周时,恩替卡韦组患者血清HBV DNA低于检测下限的比率(82.6%、97.8%、97.8%和97.8%)显著高于干扰素组(34.8%、43.5%、47.8%和52.2%),差异均具有统计学意义(χ2= 15.8、24.7、21.9、19.2,P均= 0.00);治疗24、36、48周时干扰素组患者HBeAg转阴率(34.8%、39.1%和43.5%)显著高于恩替卡韦组(4.3%、10.9%和17.4%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2= 9.1、5.9、5.4,P = 0.00、0.01、0.02);治疗24、36、48周时干扰素组患者HBeAg血清学转换率(26.1%、30.4%和30.4%)显著高于恩替卡韦组(4.3%、4.3%和8.7%),差异均具有统计学意义(χ2 = 5.1、7.0、3.9,P = 0.02、0.00、0.04);各治疗时间点恩替卡韦组患者ALT复常率(87%、97.8%、100%和100%)显著高于干扰素组(34.8%、73.9%、73.9%和65.2%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 19.7、7.2、10.1、14.9,P均= 0.00)。 结论HBeAg阳性的慢性乙型肝炎患者,恩替卡韦治疗可获得更高的HBV DNA低于检测下限的比率,而干扰素治疗可获得更高的HBeAg转阴率及血清学转换率。

关 键 词:肝炎  乙型  慢性  HBV  DNA  恩替卡韦  干扰素  
收稿时间:2015-08-11

Comparison of effects of entecavir and interferon therapy for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B
Yu Pan,Lina Wang,Zhengxia Song,Xuebing Yan,Qin Ding.Comparison of effects of entecavir and interferon therapy for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Version),2016,10(4):392-395.
Authors:Yu Pan  Lina Wang  Zhengxia Song  Xuebing Yan  Qin Ding
Institution:1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou 221006, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of entecavir and interferon for chronic hepatitis B patients with HBeAg-positive. MethodsThe 69 cases were divided into two groups, entecavir group (46 cases) and interferon group (23 cases). The serum of HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B who accepted entecavir or interferon antiviral therapy for 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks were collected. Meanwhile, the amounts of HBV DNA, HBeAg, HBeAb, serum alanine aminotransferase were detected, respectively. ResultsAt 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, the ratio of serum HBV DNA lower than the detection limit of entecavir group (82.6%, 97.8%, 97.8% and 97.8%) were significantly higher than those of interferon group (34.8%, 43.5%, 47.8% and 52.2%) (χ2= 15.8, 24.7, 21.9, 19.2; P all = 0.00). At 24, 36 and 48 weeks, HBeAg negative conversion rates of patients in interferon group (34.8%, 39.1% and 43.5%) were significantly higher than those of entecavir group (4.3%, 10.9% and 17.4%) (χ2= 9.1, 5.9, 5.4; P = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02). At 24, 36 and 48 weeks, HBeAg seroconversion rates of interferon group (26.1%, 30.4% and 30.4%) were significantly higher than those of entecavir group (4.3%, 4.3% and 8.7%) (χ2= 5.1, 7.0, 3.9; P = 0.02, 0.00, 0.04). At 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks, ALT normalization rates of patients in entecavir group (87%, 97.8%, 100% and 100%) were higher than that of interferon group (34.8%, 73.9%, 73.9% and 65.2%) (χ2= 19.7, 7.2, 10.1, 14.9; P all = 0.00). ConclusionsHBeAg-positive patients treated by entecavir could obtain higher ratio of serum HBV DNA lower than the detection limit, and those who accepted interferon could obtain higher rates of HBeAg negative conversion rate and seroconversion rate.
Keywords:Chronic hepatitis B  HBV DNA  Entecavir  Interferon  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号