Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected

A large number of reports on radiographic contrast media have appeared over the past year. The majority of these compared various properties of the new, nonionic low-osmolar agents with those of conventional ionic contrast media, including types and rates of adverse reactions, nephrotoxicity, anticoagulant effects, degree of subcutaneous injury resulting from extravasation, and gastrointestinal tolerance. In this review, recent developments in each of these areas are discussed. Although, in general, the newer agents are safer and better tolerated than ionic contrast media, their greatly increased cost prevents them from completely replacing these media. In this time of increasingly cost-conscious health care, even expert opinion concerning indications for nonionic low-osmolar contrast media use (also summarized here) is widely divided.