Estimation of the Probability of Exposure to Machining Fluids in a Population-Based Case-Control Study |
| |
| Authors: | Dong-Uk Park Dalsu Baris Molly Schwenn Margaret R Karagas Karla R Armenti |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;2. Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Korea;3. Maine Cancer Registry, Augusta, Maine;4. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire;5. Division of Public Health Services, Bureau of Public Health Statistics and Informatics, Occupational Health Surveillance Program, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, New Hampshire |
| |
| Abstract: | We describe an approach for estimating the probability that study subjects were exposed to metalworking fluids (MWFs) in a population-based case-control study of bladder cancer. Study subject reports on the frequency of machining and use of specific MWFs (straight, soluble, and synthetic/semi-synthetic) were used to estimate exposure probability when available. Those reports also were used to develop estimates for job groups, which were then applied to jobs without MWF reports. Estimates using both cases and controls and controls only were developed. The prevalence of machining varied substantially across job groups (0.1–>0.9%), with the greatest percentage of jobs that machined being reported by machinists and tool and die workers. Reports of straight and soluble MWF use were fairly consistent across job groups (generally 50–70%). Synthetic MWF use was lower (13–45%). There was little difference in reports by cases and controls vs. controls only. Approximately, 1% of the entire study population was assessed as definitely exposed to straight or soluble fluids in contrast to 0.2% definitely exposed to synthetic/semi-synthetics. A comparison between the reported use of the MWFs and U.S. production levels found high correlations (r generally >0.7). Overall, the method described here is likely to have provided a systematic and reliable ranking that better reflects the variability of exposure to three types of MWFs than approaches applied in the past. Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene for the following free supplemental resources: a list of keywords in the occupational histories that were used to link study subjects to the metalworking fluids (MWFs) modules; recommendations from the literature on selection of MWFs based on type of machining operation, the metal being machined and decade; popular additives to MWFs; the number and proportion of controls who reported various MWF responses by job group; the number and proportion of controls assigned to the MWF types by job group and exposure category; and the distribution of cases and controls assigned various levels of probability by MWF type.] |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
