Combined fine-needle aspiration,physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer |
| |
Authors: | Joyce L. Steinberg Maureen E. Trudeau Donald E. Ryder Eve Fishell Judy-Anne W. Chapman David R. McCready Edward B. Fish George Y. Hiraki Theodore M. Ross H. Lavina A. Lickley |
| |
Affiliation: | From the Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.;*Department of Medicine, University of Toronto;†Department of Pathology, University of Toronto;‡Department of Radiology, University of Toronto;§Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto;¶Department of Surgery, University of Toronto |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveTo examine the combined and individual predictive values of fine-needle aspiration (FNA), physical examination (PE) of the breast and mammography (the “triple test”) in diagnosing breast cancer in relation to the results of open surgical biopsy.DesignA study of the records of patients who received both FNA and open surgical biopsy for the same palpable breast lump. The results of diagnostic assessment and open surgical biopsy were categorized as positive or negative. Concordance (percentage of tests found to be correct at biopsy), sensitivity, specificity (percentage of patients without breast cancer for whom the diagnostic test was negative) and positive predictive value (percentage of patients with a positive test found to have breast cancer) were determined for the triple test for each diagnostic modality. In addition, prognostic variables (tumour size, node positivity, estrogen and progesterone receptor status) and outcomes were assessed in patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer.SettingA university-affiliated general hospital with a special focus on women’s health.PatientsOf 290 patients who had both FNA and open surgical biopsy, 191 underwent all three diagnostic procedures.Main Outcome MeasuresThe diagnostic accuracy of FNA, PE and mammography to permit preoperative definitive therapy or to allow observation without mandating open surgical biopsy.ResultsIn 81 patients all three diagnostic modalities were in agreement for a diagnosis of either benign or malignant disease; the concordance for the triple test was 98.8%, specificity was 100% and sensitivity was 95.5%. Nodal status, tumour size and outcome were similar whether or not the triple test was positive, but, interestingly, when the triple-test results were positive, estrogen (p < 0.05) and progesterone (p < 0.03) receptor values were more likely to be negative.ConclusionsWhen all three diagnostic modalities were in agreement for a diagnosis of malignant disease, the combination of FNA, PE and mammography had excellent concordance with the results of open surgical biopsy, and in this situation definitive treatment may be carried out. If all three modalities are in agreement for a diagnosis of benign disease, a period of close observation with repetition of FNA may be safely entertained. Lack of concordance of the three diagnostic modalities mandates biopsy. Triple-test positivity does not predict a worse outcome. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|