首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Aortic Stenosis Progression,Cardiac Damage,and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Authors:Li-Tan Yang  Amber Boler  Jose R. Medina-Inojosa  Christopher G. Scott  Matthew J. Maurer  Mackram F. Eleid  Maurice Enriquez-Sarano  Christophe Tribouilloy  Hector I. Michelena
Affiliation:1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA;2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;3. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA;4. Department of Cardiology, Amiens, University Hospital Center, Amiens, France
Abstract:ObjectivesThis study sought to compare aortic stenosis (AS) progression rates, AS-related cardiac damage (AS-CD) indicator incidence and determinants, and survival between patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)-AS and those with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-AS.BackgroundDifferences in AS progression and AS-CD between patients with BAV and patients with TAV are unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively studied consecutive patients with baseline peak aortic valve velocity (peakV) ≥2.5 m/s and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Follow-up echocardiograms (n = 4,818) provided multiparametric AS progression rates and AS-CD.ResultsThe study included 330 BAV (age 54 ± 14 years) and 581 patients with TAV (age 72 ± 11 years). At last echocardiogram (median: 5.9 years; interquartile range: 3.9 to 8.5 years), BAV-AS exhibited similar peakV and mean pressure gradient (MPG) as TAV-AS, but larger calculated aortic valve area due to larger aortic annulus (p < 0.0001). Multiparametric progression rates were similar between BAV-AS and TAV-AS (all p ≥ 0.08) and did not predict age-/sex-adjusted survival (p ≥ 0.45). Independent determinants of rapid progression were male sex and baseline AS severity for TAV (all p ≤ 0.024), and age, baseline AS severity, and cardiac risk factors (age interaction: p = 0.02) for BAV (all p ≤ 0.005). At 12 years, patients with TAV-AS had a higher incidence of AS-CD than BAV-AS patients (p < 0.0001), resulting in significantly worse survival compared to BAV-AS (p < 0.0001). AS-CD were independently determined by multiple factors (MPG, age, sex, comorbidities, cardiac function; all p ≤ 0.039), and BAV was independently protective of most AS-CD (all p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionsIn this cohort, TAV-AS and BAV-AS progression rates were similar. Rapid progression did not affect survival and was determined by cardiac risk factors for BAV-AS (particularly in patients with BAV <60 years of age) and unmodifiable factors for TAV-AS. AS-CD and mortality were significantly higher in TAV-AS. Independent determinants of AS-CD were multifactorial, and BAV morphology was AS-CD protective. Therefore, the totality of AS burden (cardiac damage) is clinically crucial for TAV-AS, whereas attention to modifiable risk factors may be preventive for BAV-AS.
Keywords:aortic stenosis  bicuspid aortic valve  cardiac damage  progression  AF"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0035"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  atrial fibrillation  AS"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0045"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  aortic stenosis  AVAi"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0075"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  aortic valve area index  BAV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0085"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  bicuspid aortic valve  CD"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0095"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  cardiac damage  DI"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0105"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  dimensionless index  LAVi"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0135"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  left atrial volume index  LV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0145"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  left ventricle  LVEF"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0155"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  left ventricular ejection fraction  LVOT"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0165"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  left ventricular outflow tract  MPG"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0175"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  mean pressure gradient  peakV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0195"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  peak velocity  SVi"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0215"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  stroke volume index  TAV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0225"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  tricuspid aortic valve
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号