首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluation of Dual Versus Triple Therapy by Landmark Analysis in the RE-DUAL PCI Trial
Authors:Benjamin E. Peterson  Deepak L. Bhatt  Ph. Gabriel Steg  Jonas Oldgren  Michael Maeng  Uwe Zeymer  Sigrun Halvorsen  Stefan H. Hohnloser  Gregory Y.H. Lip  Takeshi Kimura  Matias Nordaby  Corinna Miede  Eva Kleine  Jurriën M. ten Berg  Christopher P. Cannon
Affiliation:1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;2. Université de Paris, Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, FACT (French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials), and INSERMU1148, Paris, France;3. Uppsala Clinical Research Center and Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;4. Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark;5. Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany;6. Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;7. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany;8. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom;9. Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark;10. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan;11. Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany;12. mainanalytics, Sulzbach, Germany;13. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands;14. Medical University Centre Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Abstract:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to explore the early versus late benefits and risks of dabigatran dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy in the RE-DUAL PCI (Randomized Evaluation of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy With Dabigatran Versus Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial.BackgroundPatients with atrial fibrillation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention are at increased risk for both bleeding and thrombotic events.MethodsA total of 2,725 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were randomized to receive dabigatran 110 mg, or dabigatran 150 mg plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (and no aspirin), or warfarin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin. Landmark analysis was performed at 30 and 90 days.ResultsThere was a consistent and large reduction in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in patients randomized to dual therapy during the first 30 days (110 mg: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 0.66; p < 0.0001; 150 mg: HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.72; p = 0.0006) compared with warfarin triple therapy. There was early net clinical benefit in both dabigatran groups versus warfarin (110 mg: HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88; p = 0.0062; 150 mg: HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.79; p = 0.0015), due to larger reductions in bleeding than increased thrombotic events for dabigatran 110 mg and bleeding reduction without increased thrombotic risk for dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy versus warfarin triple therapy. After the removal of aspirin in the warfarin group, bleeding remained lower with dabigatran 110 mg and was similar with dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin.ConclusionsIn RE-DUAL PCI, in which patients in the dual-therapy arms were treated with aspirin for an average of only 1.6 days, there was early net clinical benefit with both doses of dabigatran dual therapy, without an increase in thrombotic events with dabigatran 150 mg. This could be helpful in the subset of patients with elevated risk for both bleeding and thrombotic events.
Keywords:anticoagulation  antiplatelet therapy  atrial fibrillation  percutaneous coronary intervention  BMS"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0035"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  bare-metal stent(s)  CI"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0045"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  confidence interval  CRNM"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0055"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  clinically relevant nonmajor  DES"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0065"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  drug-eluting stent(s)  DOAC"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0075"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  direct oral anticoagulant  DTE"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0085"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  death or thromboembolic event  HR"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0095"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hazard ratio  ISTH"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0105"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis  PCI"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0115"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  percutaneous coronary intervention
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号