自拟安神汤治疗232例快速型心律失常临床疗效分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 吴乐文,吕健,杨帆,傅晓霞,梁爱江. 自拟安神汤治疗232例快速型心律失常临床疗效分析[J]. 中医临床研究, 2014, 0(1): 110-111 |
| |
作者姓名: | 吴乐文 吕健 杨帆 傅晓霞 梁爱江 |
| |
作者单位: | 广东省湛江市第一中医医院; |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:对比不同治疗方法治疗快速型心律失常的总有效率,分析我院自拟的安神汤的临床治疗优势。方法:将2010年1月~2012年7月服用我院自拟的安神汤的快速型心律失常患者117例设为观察组,择取同期采取胺碘酮治疗快速型心律失常的患者115例设为对照组,对比两组用药后疗效。结果:用药1个月后,观察组与对照组治疗总有效率分别为92.3%、80.7%,观察组明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:给予快速型心律失常患者服用我院自拟的安神汤,临床疗效明显优于采用胺碘酮的治疗效果,且该种治疗方法无明显副作用,值得临床推广。
|
关 键 词: | 安神汤 快速型心律失常 胺碘酮 |
Clinical analysis on treating 232 cases of tachyarrhythmia with the self-made Anshen decoction |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To compare the total efficiency of different treatment methods on treating tachyarrhythmia and analyze the clinical advantages of Anshen decoction. Methods: From January 2010 to July 2012 in our hospital, choose 117 tachyarrhythmia patients taking Anshen decoction as the observation group; choose 115 cases taking amiodarone in the same period as control group. Compare efficacy of two groups after treatment. Results: After one month, the total efficiency of the observation group was 92.3% and control group was 80.7%. observation group was much better than the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of Anshen decoction is significantly better than amiodarone. And such treatment has no significant side effects, is worthy of promotion. |
| |
Keywords: | Anshen decoction Tachyarrhythmia Amiodarone |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录! |
|