Prognostic Value of Subdivisions of Nighttime Blood Pressure Fall in Hypertensives Followed Up for 8.2 Years. Does Nondipping Classification Need to Be Redefined?

J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich). 2010;12:508–515. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. To evaluate the long-term prognostic significance of different ranges of the percentage fall in nighttime blood pressure (BP) of the nondipping pattern, 1200 hypertensive patients (645 women, age 51±12 years) underwent ambulatory BP monitoring under stabilized therapy. The occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events was followed for 9833 patient-years and analyzed by the Cox hazard model. There were 152 CV fatal/nonfatal events (79 strokes, 51 coronary events, 22 others) during the 15.2 years of follow-up. According to nighttime BP fall (%) the authors noted: <0% (reverse-dippers RD], n=83); 0%–4.9% (nondippers 1 ND1], n=207); 5%–9.9% (nondippers 2 ND2], n=311), 10%–19.9% (dippers D], n=523); and ≥20% (extreme dippers ED], n=76). After adjustment for confounding variables, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of CV event and stroke in RD vs D were 2.29 (1.31–3.99) and 2.46 (1.11–5.49); of ND1 vs D were 1.42 (1.12–1.79) and 1.62 (1.17–2.23); and of ND1 vs ND2 were 2.24 (1.33–3.75) and 2.30 (1.15–4.58). No differences were found in RD vs ND1 and ND2 vs D. Nondippers have a higher CV risk than dippers but only for a nighttime BP fall <5% suggesting that the limits for nondipping should be redefined for a stratification of CV risk.