PPH结合痔切除与开放式外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的比较分析

目的探讨PPH结合痔切除与开放式外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的比较情况。方法分析我院普外科收治入院的痔疮患者98例临床资料,依据手术治疗措施不同进行分组,PPH结合痔切除组60例和开放式外剥内扎术组38例。结果 PPH结合痔切除组手术时间、术中出血量、创面愈合时间、住院时间均低于开放式外剥内扎术组,同时PPH结合痔切除组术后疼痛、术后尿潴留、肛门肿胀及切口渗血等均低于开放式外剥内扎术组,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论 PPH术是一种治疗痔相对简单、安全的治疗措施,其创伤和并发症方面均明显优于开放式外剥内扎术,值得临床推广应用。

The Comparative Analysis of Curing Hemorrhoids by PPH Combines the Hemorrhoids and Open Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy

Objective To approach comparative of curing hemorrhoids by PPH combines the hemorrhoids and open Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.Method To analyze 98 cases clinical data of hemorrhoids patients of our hospital Department of general surgery,which was to be divided into open Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy group 38 cases and PPH combines the hemorrhoids group 60 cases.Result The operation time,amount of bleeding,wound healing time,hospitalization time of PPH combines the hemorrhoids group were lower than open Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy group,the postoperative pain,postoperative urinary retention,anal swelling and incision oozing of blood of PPH combines the hemorrhoids group were lower than open Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy group,P〈0.05,the difference were statistical significance.Conclusion PPH is a relatively simple,safe treatment of hemorrhoids treatment,trauma and complications were significantly better than open Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy,which was to be used.