Evaluation of a faculty development program in managing care. |
| |
Authors: | Antoinette S Peters Maryjoan D Ladden Jamie B Kotch Robert H Fletcher |
| |
Institution: | Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. toni_peters@harvardpilgrim.org |
| |
Abstract: | PURPOSE. To evaluate a faculty development program that teaches quality improvement and cost-effectiveness. METHOD. From October 2000 to February 2001, a two-part faculty development program was offered to 39 physicians from 19 U.S. medical schools supported by grants from the Partnerships for Quality Education (PQE) and Undergraduate Medical Education in the 21st Century (UME-21). Special features of the program included partnerships between academic and community physicians from each school, development of an educational innovation of interest to the participants, concurrent development of teaching skills and new medical knowledge, learning leadership skills (e.g., how to train colleagues to teach), and practice periods. The program focused on quality improvement and cost-effectiveness, but included other "managing care" topics. Prior to and after the course, participants assessed their knowledge of and competence to teach these topics, as well as other managing care topics. They also assessed their competence as medical educators and leaders. After the course, they indicated their progress in implementing their proposed educational innovations. RESULTS. Thirty-two of the 39 physicians completed evaluations both before and after the program. Self-assessed knowledge and competence to teach quality improvement and cost-effectiveness were significantly higher at the end of the course, as were all self-assessed teaching and leadership skills. The largest change scores occurred in assessments of competency to teach the new topics and to teach in new ways. Participants who implemented their innovations rated their competencies to teach quality improvement and cost-effectiveness higher than did non-implementers. CONCLUSION. Opportunities for faculty to learn how to teach a topic of stated importance to them, to practice what they have learned, and to work collaboratively with partners improved teaching skills. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|