首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Action learning sets in a nursing and midwifery practice learning context: A realistic evaluation
Institution:1. Department of Nursing and Mental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hedmark University College, N-2418 Elverum, Norway;2. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden;1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden;2. Center for Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden;3. Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Sweden;1. Betanien University College, Vestlundveien 19, 5145 Fyllingsdalen, Norway;2. Faculty of Psychology, Department of Education, University of Bergen, Postboks 7807, 5020 Bergen, Norway;3. Faculty of Psychology, Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Postboks 7807, 5020 Bergen, Norway;1. William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chesnut Hill, MA, USA;2. Pioneer Valley Family Medicine, Baystate Health, USA
Abstract:Action learning sets (ALS) are used widely for organisational and workforce development, including in nursing (Anderson and Thorpe, 2004, Pounder, 2009, Young et al., 2010). In the United Kingdom, a multi-faceted educational Pilot programme for new nurses and midwives was implemented to accelerate their clinical practice and leadership development (NHS Education Scotland, 2010). Action Learning Sets were provided for peer support and personal development. The Realistic Evaluation study reported in this paper explored issues of context, mechanism and outcome (Pawson and Tilley, 1997) influencing the action learning experiences of: programme participants (recently qualified nurses and midwives, from different practice settings); and programme supporters. A range of data were collected via: online questionnaires from 66 participants and 29 supporters; three focus groups, each comprising between eight and 10 programme participants; and one focus group with three action learning facilitators. The qualitative data pertaining to the ALS are presented in this paper. Thematic data analysis of context, mechanism and outcome configurations, generated five themes: creating and sustaining a collective learning environment; challenging constructively; collective support; the role of feedback; and effectiveness of ALS. Study outcomes suggest nursing and midwifery action learning should (a) be facilitated positively to improve participants' experience; (b) be renamed to avoid learning methodology confusion; and (c) be outcome focused to evidence impact on practice.
Keywords:Action learning  Nursing  Midwifery  Research  Realistic evaluation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号